Bigbrog

I take it I didn't score any points as I don't see my name on the list?

I don't think Starocci wins against Lewis...he did not look right at all. If he loses I also predict he won't wrestle on the backside.

This is a weird start...what are they waiting for??

Can't stand that about basketball...well amongst many other reasons...lol

Can't freaking wait!! I had to come into the office but am going to pull up ESPN+ and watch on my monitor...hope I don't get into trouble...LOL

There is no other way to find out what is going on is why. And it is why I go to several different sources to try and sift out what may be true, or not, as it seems a lot of time it is somewhere in between what the MSM spews. The problem, on both sides of things, is when people just take a headline or an article exactly as written and put no critical thought into it. Of course there are biases, again on both sides, when people read things, or tend to only watch certain one-sided news channels.

SMH...the media is just nauseating.

Who was this directed at....because if it wasn't directed at yourself while looking in a mirror....then once again...babble...babble...babble....

What???!! I didn't message it anyway other than what the definition of RICO is based on what YOU wrote dum dum. I believe you are the one spinning it. Did you go and correct the thousands and thousands of headlines and post by your fellow liberals that said Trump was being with RICO (google it to find the thousands of examples)?? How is one charged with RICO if RICO isn't a law and breaking that law isn't a crime?? And what the heck was that last paragraph?? Oh that's right...babble...babble...babble

No...she isn't. Also, does your partisan crap run so deep that you can't bring any sort of criticism to a D?? She is wrong, is always wrong, and is a terrible politician...if you can't see that you are nothing but a blow hard partisan hack. You are the type of person who blames all the ill will in our country on R's and gives all the credit to the D's for anything good that happens. And you babble incoherently on top of it with your virtue signaling and victimhood mentality.

First off...it is "RICO" not "RICCO". Second...funny you completely missed highlighting the first part of the first sentence..."is a federal law". Isn't a "crime" defined as breaking a law??

As I thought...you can't explain your comment

This ought to be good....please explain

AOC....discuss....

pfff...chlorophyll boreaphyll

How here comments didn't raise the eyebrows of every single person in the US is beyond me

Weird...I don't have an account. Hmmmm....here is what the page looks like to me when I click the link.

Here you go again...because I don't think minors should be receiving puberty blocking drugs because they feel like they may be a different gender equals I am on the wrong side of history and somehow diminishing the legitimacy of a marginalized community??? How and why in the heck do you always jump to these stupid conclusions? Because I think it is biologically stupid and unsafe to administer these types of drugs in no way says anything about how I feel/treat/act towards those people that feel they are the opposite sex as to what they were born. I have a ton of empathy for those kids...I hope they get the mental health they need. I don't think they should be treated any different than anyone else. I don't think they should be teased or bullied (both things I absolutely HATE). So once again stop with your idiotic assertations. So back to the initial point...how do "medical professionals disagree with me"?? Please explain this comment.

You can click on brackets from that page

2024 NCAA Division I Championships (trackwrestling.com)

Not as a minor

Did this post make you feel better? Because it sure didn't answer my simple question. I will continue to ask questions about bad ideas.

Who knew that posting a link to answer a question someone asked of you is showing "no respect" and "letting emotions control your actions"??

What suffering is being caused to US citizens by vetting people who want to come to the US BEFORE they are let in??

"There is no doubt whatsoever that human burning of fossil fuels is the primary driver of recent climate change." Not sure how someone can say this while saying that they "stay focused on the science". Right now the THEORY by some media/politicians/scientists is that humans are the main/sole reason for the recent climate change (this too could be debated); however, there is no way to say it is with 100% certainty, or it is fact. If you do say that you are picking and choosing which "science" you follow...and it isn't science at that point but rather pure rhetoric. I'll say this again, and it is backed by way more actual science/data/evidence, humans do in fact have an impact on the environment. To what extent, it is nearly impossible to know. The SCIENCE shows that there have been huge changes in our climate over billions of years including many of them in which there were no such thing as current humans. Even so, we should not pollute the environment, or minimize it as much as possible. We should always be looking for cheaper/better/more efficient/higher quality ways to get our energy. But the "sky is falling" (pun intended) climate change activists need to stop...it is unproductive and stupid.