ThreePointTakedown

I am comfortable just disagreeing to your lazy sleuthing and have no compunction to calling you out. You don't make it difficult.

And it doesn't sound like you can refute what I said. So you deflect to where you're more comfortable. Don't melt.

Guy owes $90m+ for defamation case probably more soon. What a moron! Can't help himself. Owes NY $454m+ for fraud and probably doesn't have the cash to pay it. Was caught hording dozens of boxes of presidential records they were not suppose to have. Was told to give them back. Said no. Then did but not all of them. Had facility searched to find more in a bathroom and ballroom. Was against Bud Light when it was convenient. Then turned around on AB when they threw him a fundraiser. Was against Tik Tok when it was convenient. Now says that banning it in the US would be a bad idea. Saying this not long after having a convo with a major investor in Tik Tok parent company. Owe I forgot, took millions of dollars directly from foreign governments while in office through businesses. Will soon be offered classified briefings on a trove of issues from Gaza to Ukraine to Taiwan. The briefings will be altered to include lots more pictures per his request because he doesn't read that much and it helps to hold his attention. Should someone like this get a security clearance for anything, let alone be allowed to be President? The answer is, No! Obviously. If you disagree please explain? If 'what-about-ism' is anywhere in your post, you lose. Sorry. My rules!

Who is the ExDir of CIS? If it helps he wrote for FAIR which: The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) is a nonprofit, anti-immigration organization in the United States.[6][7] The group publishes position papers, organizes events, and runs campaigns in order to advocate for changes in U.S. immigration policy. The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies FAIR as a hate group with ties to white supremacist groups.[8][9][10][11][12] A. HATE. GROUP! Do you really want to prop up a guy that was ok writing for the newsletter of a hate group? He'd have to turn the corner on a few issues before he could be considered an authority on this particular subject. Let alone the organization that he has run for the bulk of his adult life. If you could find some documentation of a group that opposes or is at best neutral to the issue, that agrees with your points it might help. You have people that agree with you telling you things you agree with and trying to tell us that its fact. You have a long way to go before any of this is compelling in the least.

I'm sure there are plenty of easily verifiable facts that go along with this and not just questions and circumstance that leads to 'its just obvious' conclusions.

Which policies can be tied back to George Soros?

"We love this guy," Trump said of Hannity. "He says, 'You're not going to be a dictator, are you?' I said: 'No, no, no, other than day one. We're closing the border, and we're drilling, drilling, drilling. After that, I'm not a dictator.'" How long do you think it will take to do all the drilling, drilling, drilling, until he is satisfied and will stop being a dictator?

There needs to be evidence of the thing before you can reasonably believe the thing could even possibly exist. It seems as if you really really want to believe a thing is true. Asking a question like that will get you a show on fox but doesn't actually do the work of proving the thing is real. Rather than asking the question just bring the evidence. Make it rock solid rather than the flimsy innuendo that you hope will convince others to do the work you should've done first.

Yes and since, based on your logic, you can't determine they are illegal, so it proves that you must treat them as legal. You don't like doing THAT tho. Oh no. We can't have that. Again, you don't like them for some reason. I'll venture a guess, you know what that reason is and don't want to admit it because no one likes those people but for a very obvious reason.

Then we moved on. To show that at no point is the program bad or wrong. But that you don't like it because it helps people you don't like. There is a word for that.

I'm sorry you feel this has proven something. Must have taken you a long time to research. So much red yarn wasted. I hate that you used your time in creating this mess that only you can understand. That you want to believe it doesn't make it true. Sorry again. When you get actual evidence of something you can try again. Ps. Pepe Silvia does work here!

Didn't think you would. Just wanted to point out how ridiculous you are and how desperate you are to dislike someone for no reason other than your own bias. Congrats!

It isn’t only TSMC that is being stymied by DEI: Access to microchips is a national security issue, as well as being fundamental to a modern economy. And yet Congressional majorities care more about DEI shibboleths and feeding pork to their constituencies than about American security and prosperity. Of course, that isn’t really an irony. The whole point of DEI is hating America, and if it imperils our security and our prosperity, so much the better. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/03/dei-destroys-chips.php Sorry but this opinion piece is not credible. Digging just a bit the examples that it sites are not accurate to back up their point. The assumptions they are treating as fact do not lend credence to the idea of the piece. There are no sources from the companies themselves. Examples: Google AI, did not 'refuse' to draw certain historical figures Biden announces $: 'Industry, lawmakers worry semiconductor production could take years because of negotiations, permitting and worker shortages' This could be a reason, don't you think? Cancelled projects: 'Construction on two factories now slated to be finished in late 2026 as company also waits for government incentives' Gov't incentives slow, but they also cite slowing chips market. Interesting that gets left out. TSMC: Delay in Arizona project. Delays happen. Considering they announced the project the same year the bill was passed. They may have not done their homework. Also, TSMC is investing $40b instead of $12 they were initially going to spend. That's better! Samsung: 'Samsung is apparently scaling back its Texas operation due to uncertain financial factors, including CHIPS Act subsidies and the global economy.' Do they mention those in the article? Nope, sure don't. Almost as if they left them out to shape a narrative, who woulda thunk it. Interpret: 'Any firm seeking a chip grant of more than $150 million must submit an employee child-care plan “in tandem with community stakeholders,” which means unions and progressive groups.' I love that they label 'Progressive groups' as pro-child care! This article is a joke. Can't stop smiling at this idiocy. Justice-involved: Link to department of labor page describing terms. Yawn. Before that it states as outrageous that companies will have to submit plans to train, educate, and employ 'LOTS' of women! Is this seriously trying to say that women are the problem here and not the morons that believe this crap? Bragged: sure did! Any re-dumb-licans brag about money from a bill they voted against? 500 employees flown: No confirmation if they were sent or arrived. Convenient. But that TSMC agreed to send fewer employees with more specialized skills, if necessary. All to resolve the conflict of hurt feelings. Who are the snowflakes again? In Arizona no less? Risky. Japan: A company is trying to teach you a lesson in diversity. You should listen. Germany: And inclusion. Own goal! (Break for intermission): This is fun. Poland: If you had the capacity to feel embarrassed for believing any of this crap, I hope its kicking in now. Israel: You can't make this up. Complaining that companies are running from America's DEI requirements(they aren't) are diversifying their chip output in other countries. Not mad, just disappointed. Next few paragraphs don't have links. Interesting they have no evidence of their claims. Par for the course I guess. Ireland: Intel investing in facility in Ireland because of the EU version of the CHIPS act. BAHAHAHAHAHA! HBCU: Considering every issue the government has been doing that has been mentioned in this article is negative. I am guessing they feel a program for HBCU schools to help 'Build a Skilled and Diverse Workforce in Producing Semiconductors' is bad. This author is awful close to being a bigot. Would hate for that to be true or of a reader that believes this mess. CHIPS 2.0: Is a department head bragging about a program that is trying to fix a complicated problem. So to wrap up, this is whining whiner who whines about not being able to reject people based on how they look or where they were born or how much money they had growing up. They are a clown. Thanks for reading. PS. I think posting this and acting as if it is true, was a lazy. BOOOO!

Are these people here illegally? I'll bet you will provide evidence to back up your answer.

Can anyone else find this mystery info? Coke bottles over here can't seem to find it. Would hate to have to call this beacon of truth a liar. So help me out?

I love the parenthesis in this article. That they are assuming things to be true that they cannot verify calls into question the entire thing, don't you think? So the U.N., that gets money from how many countries, uses some of it so that people in desperate need of help, get help. This bothers you why?

Sure. So what is the take away? That this is happening. We knew that already. Are these migrants here illegally? Probably not. So what's your issue with it?

I did. It isn't there. So either you missed it or I did or its not there. Care to remedy that? So not knowing if this article covers people meeting that criteria, you just included it because you don't like them or Massachusetts? What was your point that this article was suppose to make? In other words you're fine with these programs across the board.

Care to point out where. Any thoughts on the question I posed?

Article doesn't address federal funds. So, if the migrants have come into the country, legally seeking asylum, then get shipped to a city away from the point of entry, that state shouldn't help them get on their feet, so they can start contributing and help to recoup that initial cost?

So you meant that state governments, Not the federal government are helping to temporarily house migrants?

Recap. https://www.koco.com/article/nex-benedict-death-oklahoma-nonbinary-student-police-investigation/60125921

Where are the examples of that actually happening?

Does this hold true for those making the claim in the first place?

What did 45 do that would lend any credence to your statement? Same for the current administration?