jackwebster

Might cause some concern for the guy standing across the mat. Even the refs might think twice about that stall warning.

Re SDSU: How many Tanners does it take to screw in a light bulb?

Haha. Honestly, my dad is too gracious for that. He would think "Of course my blood won. Was there ever any doubt?" but would say "That was a hard fought match. Both boys really put it on the line."

Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

Obviously, this topic was a ruse to lodge my own complaint. So here goes, Matt Brown: If he would have beaten Chris Perry in the finals despite all of the stall tactics, Ok State would have had to look in the mirror much sooner. They would have recognized that scientific stalling will only get you so far.

No. Just tongue-in-cheek.

If you're not a Penn State fan, I imagine you want to blame somebody for the sorry state of your team. So, who you pointing the finger at?

Heard that, but I think he delivered it with a wink.

Idk there's a reductio ad absurdum problem here.

I'm going with the Rialto.

Yeah, on a controversial call. If I were the ref, he woulda been awarded the 2. But what did Vito say . . . I had more numbers.

66 lbs finals Mavlet Batirov vs. Adam Batirov https://www.flowrestling.org/video/5291472-66-lbs-finals-mavlet-batirov-vs-adam-batirov

I had to wrestle my step- brother in a ranking match / interested dual. Yada yada 4 months later, my step dad was gone.

Greg Stiltner was tall. Go to 1.23.00

This is the 2nd/3rd time in the past couple weeks that __________ have been called punches. I fall for it every time. I see -- x "punches" y -- and I click the link. Ejections / suspensions / bans are warranted in every case, but I don't see punches.

I'm not looking down thread first, so here goes: Epperly McKee Sheets?

So this God is beholden to a set of ethical principles. I assume that the way to skirt the contradiction is to say that he created the ethics. If so, couldn't he through the same creative power make a new set?

How can a "perfect," I.e. "complete," thing get more perfect? What you are suggesting reminds me of Blake's gnosticism: the demiurge just keeps spitting out more gods, breaking itself over and over again. Perhaps this is why some folks see Christianity as polytheistic.

Then by definition this God isn't omnipotent

Though not so good at the graphic design.

Re breaking: I have always thought that mental collapses in later rounds of Grand Slam tennis were the most compelling to watch. The kind of doubts that take hold in 30 sec in a wrestling match, slowly creep in over an hour long set played. Slowly, you see "COMEON!!" become "Reset" become "Let me get the next one please" become "AREYOUKIDDINGME!" become "uncle" become "I hate myself and want to die." Add to the stress the fact that in tennis you don't know when you will finally get put out of your misery if you keep trying. Years of work for your therapist after dropping a match when you were up 2 sets to none.

Had a sadistic coach who was in a group of 3 with me and this other freshman first semester: one man got stay in on top for 15 minutes (?) of 30~60 sec goes. That jackass got in on top, threw legs and just chked the shit out of both of us for the whole time. We both broke. F*@# that guy. What were we supposed to do? Fight him?

What about the double break: Alton vs Grajales?

Re Dr. Death: all you could see were his hands and feet.