GreatWhiteNorth

Yawn... Raging frauds that have jokes - are still nothing more than raging frauds.

Let's get this straight: This is easy to figure out. If he's convicted of rape, then it's because he's a rapist. Otherwise, he's not. It does, however, kill some of your conspiracy theory BS.

Ban is right, it's not that hard to figure out what is news - but it requires that people use a nominal filter. Which some do. Your post here is super weak. You attack the "leftist media" with your comments, as being somehow equivalent to click bait. That is clear bias. Any clown could say the same about either party. You have no business analyzing the legitimacy of news sites. 'Broad spectrum of sources' - Your advice is to "learn" from sources with obvious bias (including those supported by enemy foreign states? Even if that fact is not evident for most internet users?) Worst advice possible on the topic. You are merely encouraging people to consider garbage sites - those that are funded by the enemies of the US, and are specifically designed to divide and anger US citizens. It's terrible advice. I never really noticed you here. But now that I see you, you seem to be quite a raging fraud.

As lawyers say, "Ignorance is not a defense." At least not a very good one.

Not the journalists. It's the internet hacks who are in it to get clicks - don't have any information, lead potential readers to their sites with headline 'bait' that turns out to have nothing to do with the actual 'articles' at the site. Doesn't matter to them, the more outlandish the garbage they use the better from their perspective, they literally get paid by the click. If you click it, they are paid. Yet, people read these things and often don't even know they've been duped. These hacks are obviously not journalists. Yet they claim to be news. Worse yet, it's the foreign government sponsored sites. They don't care about the clicks, they only care about trying to convince (in our case) US citizens that our country is in deep trouble and, blah blah blah <insert whatever thing they want us to believe here>. Even if we many aren't duped, they only need enough to be duped to create a rift. What is valuable to them, is that they want US citizens to stop trusting mainstream news. Even though the site is complete garbage, if they can get some to start to distrust- it's a win for them. They want the chaos that mistrust and arguing creates - this is the biggest problem. These people are obviously not journalists either. Yet they claim to be news. It's a lot like some of the far left blame the cops for our social problems. The cops are NOT the problem. Similar thing here - the far right blames the journalists for our news problems. The journalists are NOT the problem. (And it's not a R vs D problem either. It exists across parties. It's primarily a "stop getting your news from the internet" problem.)

... and it kept getting worse after that. This 'Pa in Taiwan' is 100% turd.

In any reputable establishment, the headlines match the article. Period. Full stop. If you read headlines that 'don't match' the article - the site isn't credible. You've been duped. Stop reading and stop going there. The crazy thing is that so many people have been duped for so long, that they consider it somewhat normal. It isn't. It isn't normal and it isn't factual. This would go a long way in explaining why so many here believe ideas that they've read on illegit sites.

My guess is that there would be a mass exodus from Twitter/X. Just a hunch. Switching to a subscription model may well be the quickest way to kill any popular free internet site.

Blab all you like, won't change a thing. You're just another turd selling the US is behind 9/11 BS. Nothing more.

You're exhausting, but OK. First of all, your post was ridiculous. To somehow think that (your post) if "the world determined the US was in the wrong..." could even remotely happen is lunacy. Given our lack of any real global unity, and witnessing things like Russia's horrible and indefensible criminal attack on Ukraine, China's horrendous treatment of Uyghers, (as you say), etc. etc. Without any clear globally respected judgement available, there simply is no 'world' group that could determine if the US was in the right or wrong. It's just hypothetical nonsense. Given that - any such claimed determination would have no merit and be no better than my own determination. Thus, I'm posting my determination that the US was not wrong, and anyone who says otherwise can kiss my ass. Not trying to be the arbiter of all things, more interested in putting things in perspective. (Oh - and also was going to reference it for that dumb ass jross so it knows what a US 'homer' actually looks like.)

The disgusting one where you claim the US is behind the 9/11 attacks!? Never. That was a miserable post. You are a POS for making the claim. You can't hide it from it, you posted it.

We're at a message board, not a poker table. There are no 'turns'. Are you brainless and not from the US? (Don't get too worked up about my questions, they are rhetorical.)

Thanks for the translation - I would have otherwise had no idea what you meant by "eat the shit" Quite scholarly of you.

Pfffft... you think others here don't read the other topics? I am watching worlds. No doubt. Husker is mostly right, you're a nutcase wanting to be an arbiter.

As a regular nutjob here, you are surely familiar with obtuse.

You're backing the other nutjob poster who believes the CIA was behind the 9/11 attack. That's just perfect. What country are you actually from?

Your post is DAF. (Which isn't anything new.) "if they world determined the US was in the wrong for Iraq" - I don't particularly care what "they world" determined. They are wrong and can kiss my ass. The US was not wrong. When did you choose to join the other side?

Well... there goes the neighborhood.

Now you are showing your true colors: You, 'Offthemat', claim the CIA was somehow behind the 9/11 attack. Truly disgusting post.

Fair point - in the interest of credibility, even if only for you, I'm updated my post. [EDIT] Jross's post was not: try not to only eat shit from the USA. It was actually: try not to only eat the shit the USA news feeds us.

Your post was a bunch of word soup mixed together into a pile of BS. And yet another conspiracy theory. Madeline Albright was quite an impressive woman. She was very good. Your quote from her was out of context... and from 1996.

You don't know what a 'homer' is. And that's disappointing. Homers don't post negative messages about their teams... it's the most basic principle behind being a homer. C'mon man. How out of touch are you with American culture? Are you even from the USA? I doubt it.

You post Chinese propaganda and tell us we should learn from it? Then you tell us you "love the USA" (Wait, it gets better) Then you tell us you try not to only eat shit from the USA. If anybody thought jross was a credible poster. "Here's your sign."

If you believe the USA commits war crimes and more, then you are not a USA homer. That would make you a fake.

"Saw it mentioned"... followed by junk post. Oh, ok.