Correct. That is why I said session 1. However at the first session, I saw a number of guys win matches over members of the more prestigious conferences.
For instance, ACC reps went 3-0 at 125 beating #13, #6, and #7... all of whom were seeded higher.
133 3-0
141 3-0
149 2-1 (PSU guy lost)
157 3-0
165 2-1 including #20 over #13
174 1-2 not good!
184 3-2
197 2-2
285 1-2 also not good
I don't think I missed anyone, but it is possible.
20-10. Overall, pretty solid. In the seeding discussions before the tournament, I read that 'ACC and SoCon champs would be placing 8th in the Big 10.'
Obviously, they look a little better than that, granted it is still early. Yes, I know they will take some beatings in future rounds, but good start.