1032004
-
Posts
3,557 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Teams
College Commitments
Rankings
Authors
Jobs
Store
Everything posted by 1032004
-
Yes, “in theory” is of course just a guess and a lot can change by next year. I don’t like either of them either. Just saying I don’t think next year’s teams will be all that different especially when you consider tonight’s results. Anthony likely isn’t beating Swiderski or Paniro if he’s not in jail, and Iowa won 184 (Angelo) and 197 (AJ) tonight. Like I said, could come down to Kueter vs Bastida. Or not, no one knows.
-
Here is the Chittum replay
-
Lol you seem triggered. Long time until next year, maybe Iowa gets some more portal guys
-
Check the video a couple posts up. I agree with no TD, but it’s awfully close
-
As he pointed out though, they restarted and wrestled 1 second… I was more commenting on prior to that.
-
@jross I actually just watched this like 20x and I actually could see this being called either way. It does seem like there is an ever so slight pause while Woods has his knee down, that you could probably argue was “reaction time.” Reaction time really needs to be defined…
-
Oh shoot I think you’re right, forgot about that. That part of the rule seems contradictory
-
Why not just enter unattached though?
-
Not sure who else Iowa will have at 157 or 141 next year, but off the top of my head ISU probably becomes the favorites at those weights with Iowa becoming the favorite at 165, which would give them the dual if in theory the rest of the matches have the same outcome as tonight.
-
Also, what would be the advantage of wrestling attached at the Soldier Salute?
-
FWIW, Minnow claims that Swafford was suspended for gambling at least for tonight, possibly the season…
-
Next year should still be close no? Of tonight’s winners, ISU loses only Carr, while Iowa loses Woods and Franek. Could come down to Bastida vs Kueter
-
Yeah I think this is what’s been happening in practice, and yes for that reason I think fewer matches will go into overtime.
-
I’m not a fan of either team so no I probably wouldn’t have “cared,” but I would have thought it was the wrong call. Chittum was closer to a takedown than Woods IMO, and seems like the refs agreed.
-
Ha. Very true. Can probably add 125
-
Actually Brain seems upset about this one, and did point out that they did actually wrestle the last second…
-
Maybe. And I was surprised he didn’t challenge and probably would have if I was him. Just don’t think it “lost them the dual”
-
I don’t think Echemendia had the TD. End of Chittum was reviewed. What other situation would’ve made a difference to challenge?
-
Good point, but maybe Gaitan knew the score? If just listening to coaches why would he attempt a turn?
-
To be fair Gaitan did come close to turning him. Gaitan getting a turn there probably a similar chance as another TD given the little time left
-
Well you need control beyond reaction time so no TD, but basically yes
-
I was surprised he didn't challenge in the moment, but looked like the correct call after rewatching
-
Which brings up the question, how long is "reaction time" anyway? I think Chittum had "control" as the clock went to zero, but not enough time for reaction time
-
Not gifted, but just squeaked by opponents they should have been pushing for bonus against
-
No, IMO after re-watching due to reaction time
