Jump to content

1032004

Members
  • Posts

    3,557
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by 1032004

  1. This was Kilkeary’s last date to still be in redshirt right?
  2. Hard to tell for sure but it looks like they did shake hands around 11:00 here - but then Ryan was rightfully yelling at the ref so by the time the ref raised Davis’s hand Kilkeary was gone.
  3. If they have an independent reviewer, you can probably get rid of the second ref. The main additional value they provide except another opinion (which can be replaced by the independent reviewer) is helping with end of period timing (which can also be replaced by an independent reviewer), and giving another angle for locked hands - and even that they screwed up in one match recently
  4. Tom Ryan politely asking for refs not to review their own calls Kevin Ward/Mark Branch taking a different approach
  5. Uh oh, looks like Minnow being a “paid hater” here
  6. No one wants to watch Will Lewan wrestle for an hour
  7. Fair enough, but I think the difference is double OT matches are just a portion of total OT matches, and the first SV period is pretty self-explanatory. I’m not opposed to criteria overall though. It would also shorten the length of duals and tournaments which would be a good thing IMO.
  8. I think this one did deserve its own thread, IMO. But yeah, the PSU looked human one definitely unnecessary
  9. I will also say I was impressed when Lemley beat Mitch Moore like 5 times in one match
  10. Need someone to brighten up that picture. Hard to see with the shadow
  11. Hopefully they don’t have the same trainer there that “evaluated” Shapiro
  12. Same tweet discussed here Unfortunately, I’d guess @billyhoyle is mostly right. At minimum, this likely will not be not good for any team that doesn’t join the SEC or Big 10, although more probably will.
  13. Nolf likely wins that match anyway. But Hidlay had a takedown
  14. Should we count last night as a loss for Davis for ranking purposes?
  15. Same ref as last night.. Clear NF missed at 6:15, although in the ref’s defense they reviewed this in the booth and did not overturn…
  16. That’s one option for sure, but I think it makes it more confusing for casual fans (not that that should be a dealbreaker) I do like having the first 2 minute SV period on your feet though
  17. The obvious difference there is they’ve already gained an advantage of 59 seconds vs an advantage of only 1 second. If they’re going to award a point for a 1 second advantage, they should at least not erase the riding time that was earned in regulation
  18. That’s an oversimplification IMO, as it will also be impacted by the strategy you employ earlier in the match, and not all 2OT matches will have 0-0 first periods, so I still think it’s better than winning by 1 second of RT. I’m open to other ideas. Maybe shorten the UTB to 20 seconds so an escape is more difficult? Keep alternating sets of 2 30 second periods until 1 person actually has a higher score?
  19. Lol I am by no means a PSU fan and like I said this call was “trash,” and I usually try to defend the refs. A youth referee may get rattled by being yelled at, but D1 refs won’t. Again, I wouldn’t necessarily say that Cael is “getting” calls, it’s that other coaches may be “losing” them by acting like idiots. Although Ryan usually isn’t too bad so I don’t think that applies in this instance.
  20. I had to google what this means, but I disagree
  21. Anyone else think this needs to be changed? Winning on 1 second of riding time seems silly to me, I’d much rather see the high school version of the ultimate tiebreaker with just 1 30 second period. I’d also entertain an unlimited time on your feet or something but Michael DeAugustino, Will Lewan, and 30% of heavyweight matches would never end.
×
×
  • Create New...