From the article:
"the woman whose story Sen. Katie Britt appeared to have shared in the Republican response to the State of the Union last week,"
"Britt defended her use of the graphic story and declined to clearly state that the incident in question had not occurred during the Biden administration."
So they don't really know if the article is true. And she declined it had not occurred ... A nice double negative but also doesn't tell us how she "declined" if she wasn't asked is that a decline, if she couldn't remember is that a decline?
Where does Britt disclose who this person is? What they put in quotes says Britt went down there and she claims Biden's policy is a disgrace. Both those things can be true and don't have to be directly link. The "journalist" could've done some research and let us know when these alleged events occurred but didn't. Given that, it makes it look like a hit piece not good journalism.