The FBI director does not make charging decisions. Stating it would be inappropriate for the fbi director to testify in a public hearing as to why someone else made the decision they made is accurate, not stonewalling.
It’s well known the main point of the theory is that he was involved in the protest in the crowd (which he openly admits) and he was seen on video whispering in someone’s ear right before that someone rushed the cops and went into the Capitol.
What is well known to those who paid attention to the case, is that that someone when arrested and questioned stated that the man who whisperer to him (he did not know who Ray Epps was at this time) said to him that he should relax, stay calm, police are just here doing there job. That was his own statement (the man who charged the police and was arrested). I’m sure if it were appropriate for an FBI director to explain someone’s else’s charging decision to a public congressional hearing, he would have been more than happy to offer that answer. But it is not. That part of the case is kept under the rug by people that want a different truth.
Too close for the evening: No one is saying there is zero conspiracy, or shenanigans of other forms in any government agency, party, etc. Pointing out items that are not is not a blanket statement that it does not exist. That’s just blatant hyperbole. And blatant hyperbole toward items that are not, takes focus away from those that truly are. Usually….there’s a reason for doing that.