Dogbone

The rule is not written as clear as you keep asserting (and I have never stated a rule should be ignored). The takedown rule has subjectively in the definition of reaction time. We just disagree on the application of the subjectivity.

Please show me the rule that is written that he has to hold him there for a full second?? By that definition you will never have TD with :01 left of clock unless it is secured with :02 left on the clock. And if you believe that just because 2 officials don't overturn their own call means they applied the rule correctly, then you must believe there has never been a bad call ever.

Here is the definition of reaction time: Reaction time is determined by each individual referee and is described only as a period of time that is not instantaneous� Robb certainly had control inbounds for a period of time that is not instantaneous. The only subjective part (again, this is all subjective and not some made up "clear definition of control") is what is enough "reaction" time? There isn't a "reaction" from Levi that will prevent the TD (on his butt with Robb's arms locked around him), only the out of bounds will save him. I'm arguing that if there is a clear TD inbound and nothing can prevent the TD from occurring, it should be a takedown. If you believe Levi should be given some courtesy undefined amount of time to avoid the TD, regardless of how impossible it would be to achieve, and they went out of bounds before Levi could get said time then we will just have to agree to disagree.

Please point me to this "clear written rule of definition of control" that you speak of.... This what referees do, apply the rules that don't cover every exact situation (the rule book would be 1000s of pages long) and apply them to the action they see. All I am arguing is that they should use common sense when APPLYING the rules. No one has stated they should ignore anything.

No, my argument is the rule should be applied using common sense. I know, it's a crazy thought on the internet. If someone gets a clear TD with :01 left, its still a TD even if there wasn't enough time for reaction time. If there is clear TD inbounds but not enough reaction time before they go out of bounds it doesn't change the position or the control.

While I understand the no reaction time argument, there needs to be common sense. Levi is on his butt with Robbs arms locked around his waist, there is no reaction that is going to help him avoid a TD except to roll over an pretend a wizzer has an impact. If they are in the center, Robb doesn't drag his feet/hips to stay in and and covers hips immediately and its 2! If we want to create action/scoring, you can't let the out of bounds save guys from "reaction time"

Regardless of Hardy/Woods TD count. Based on their resume I think, Woods should be the #1 seed over AA.

141: #2 Real Woods (Iowa) dec. #4 Brock Hardy, 6-4 First period: Woods hits a head to the inside single but Hardy rolls through at the edge and no takedown. Great scramble but no points. Nebraska challenges that there was a takedown for Hardy. After review, a takedown and no near fall. Hardy leads 2-0 with 1:25 to go. Hardy locks up a cradle but Woods rolls through and gets a reversal to a tilt. Woods leads 8-2 after a two-point tilt and a four-point tilt but there's another Nebraska challenge. After review, reversal, and two near fall. The score stands at 4-2 with 29 seconds. Second period: Woods starts down and nearly shakes off Hardy but Hardy maintains position and is still on top. Woods rolls through and snags a reversal halfway through the period for a 6-2 lead. Woods attempts a couple of tilts but doesn't score any additional points. Third period: Neutral to start the period. Neither wrestler commits to any serious scoring attempts but Hardy gets to a leg with 20 seconds left and scores at the edge, but Real Woods wins 6-4. via: https://www.flowrestling.org/articles/10387645-nebraska-vs-iowa-match-notes Woods 2 reversals and 2 NF: 6 Hardy: 2 TDs: 4

Hardy and Woods have wrestled 14 minutes this season and the total TDs are: Hardy 2 Woods 1.

Since Malik earned an allocation, once he doesn't enter the qualifier, the B1G loses the spot and only the top 8 earned automatic bids, correct?