125: Troy Spratley dec Luke Stanich 0-3
133: Ryan Crookham dec Reece Wittcraft (Fix to continue healing) 3-3
141: Tagen Jamison dec Malyke Hines 3-6
149: Jordan Williams dec Drew Munch 3-9
157: Max Brignola major dec Daniel Manibog 7-9
165: Izzak Olejnik major dec Jake Logan 7-13
174: Brayden Thompson fall Thayne Lawrence 7-19
184: Duston Plott major dec Caden Rogers 7-23
197: Michael Beard dec Luke Surber 10-23
285: Nathan Taylor dec Konner Doucet (double overtime advantage in dramatic fashion) 13-23 in favor of OSU Central
Good question. I don't know how many teams from other divisions would be of a similar caliber to the bottom rung of division one. If wrestlestat dual rankings are a guide, Gannon is the 18th ranked dual team in D2. Kent State is 69th in D1
Even then, Penn State expects to win by more than double. In fact many are saying that if Penn State does not at least have double the points of the second place team, it will be considered a major disappointment, and Cael could be on the hot seat.
I haven't seen many over the "overly explaining" type people end up in positions of leadership. Mostly because it's often a poor strategic tactic if you're viewing a debate as a win/lose.
While true in theory, I can also envisage a world in which he has done it nicely thousand times before and been ignored. Who knows. That's how most business world works though
I think when you provide rankings, you are giving a blunt, non-reactive message. When a person doesn't like the message, they may want to respond in kind. I agree Kozak was most noble, followed by Borelli, with Pyles as a distant last
Whining as a pejorative for calling out what he perceived to be as an injustice against his wrestler and his program. It's not as bad as it sounds and the world presents these situations to all of us