The question is, is this dangerous video to release?
Chuck Schumer says it is. White House says this action by Tucker Carlson takes away his credibility. How so? Because he provided video that the government wouldn't? That loses him credibility? I think it loses the government their credibility because there is obviously another story there that they did not/do not want told.
We have been told by the Jan 6 committee all these years that it was an all out assault. Granted, there was property damage. But most folks were holding up their cellphones taking video of the inside of a building they were not supposed to be in, rather than holding up the weapons that an armed renegade coup should have had. There were no arms brandished by the invaders. They seemed to be more interested in looking around than in destruction or taking over the government. I could be missing something but that video does not provide the basis for what the Jan 6 committee has been saying all this time.
I have said before and I'll say again, those that destroyed property should pay for those crimes, same as summer of love rioters should. Those that were in the building when they shouldn't have been should pay a price for that. Same as the rioters in 2020, they should all pay a price for their participation in that.
mspart