mspart

They would find out and not be upset, they would adjust the terms of the loan to fit the situation. The banks are not in the business of losing money on loans. It does happen but they are careful. In Trump's case they verified asset worth and overall found it favorable and went ahead with the loan. But he was prosecuted anyway. And this is why businesses are very concerned in NY and why the governor felt the need to try to tamp those concerns down by saying they are not Trump so they will not be prosecuted. mspart

Your first statement would be true if it were Conspiracy theory. Comey said it was not. Hillary's email server was a con against her? https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent. With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.” There is no con. Hillary had emails that were classified in a server that was not on State Department property. Comey said so in his statement that, "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case." So she broke the law, caught red handed, but they won't prosecute. That is what the above says. No conspiricy. No con. She did it and they didn't prosecute when they could have and had ample evidence to get a conviction. You mention DC servers were notoriously security conscious. This server was not in DC, but in fact was located remotely in Chappaqua, New York. So your statement shows ignorance of the situation. Colin Powell was at the beginning of email-dom so I give him a pass. By the time Hillary stepped up, there were laws in place governing the use of email by government employees. She worked around these and by credible sources exposed this data to foreign actors. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html When the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, said on Tuesday that his investigators had no “direct evidence” that Hillary Clinton’s email account had been “successfully hacked,” both private experts and federal investigators immediately understood his meaning: It very likely had been breached, but the intruders were far too skilled to leave evidence of their work. I think I have fairly shown that she was caught red handed with classified documents in her possession on her personal server when they should not have been on that server. She was most likely hacked by foreign actors per NYT reporting. All of this was acknowledged by Comey with his recommendation that she not be prosecuted. I have given you various sources here that should be credible to you. Now it was not a Conspiracy theory. She did it and didn't pay for it. We know Biden did it and won't pay for it. Trump did no worse and is paying for it. If looking at this objectively doesn't give you the idea that there is a two tiered system of justice, you will never think that and will continue to believe your consipiracy theories about conspiracy theories. And you will be proven wrong as you have been here. mspart

Woke is broke. mspart

Correct. And this trans discussion we are having as a nation is not about these individuals. It is about people thinking they can change their sex and have everyone else go along for the charade. Like men who say they are women going in women's bathrooms and changing rooms. Like men who say they are women who compete in women's sports. In Canada there is a 50 year old guy thinking he is female and swimming against 13 year old girls. And showering and dressing with them. I guess he is pretending he is a young teen girl as well. That has nothing to do with chromosomal issues as just brought up. That is a red herring argument to make and anyone who is intellectually honest does not go there. mspart

It is a big decision to make for sure. Being a Tweener can't be fun. Do we know what kind of cuts in weight Dake, Taylor, and Snyder have to make? For Gilman I think it is pretty drastic. Mason is probably ok. Cox going to 125 doesn't make sense to me. He would need to fill out quite a bit and I don't see that on his frame. But he may have a chance to make the team there where I don't think he has any chance at 97. Maybe this time he won't be late to weigh ins. I would think Retherford would go to 65. Dake has 74 pretty well locked up but I have a small hope for JB. I don't think Retherford is in that league yet. Whatever happens, the OTTs will be spectacular this year I think. mspart

I thought you were talking Wago electrical connectors. Boy am I out of touch. They should have named the Wagyu just to confuse everyone. mspart

This is true. It would be pretty tough for most everyone. But that fits with the lefts population control ideology. Get rid of the bad humans. mspart

We have a stream that runs all winter through our yard. In fact in a heavy rain this year it overflowed the 2 foot diameter drainage pipe and flooded my neighbors garage. Not so much water running in the summer. So that would be a bummer. I gots the big bag lifestraw. So if I can get it, I can filter it. mspart

Are you sure? What was that you said about reading comprehension? Hopefully this is not too much for you to read and comprehend. It's all you, and nothing but the you. But I will spell it out for you. First you quote Husker's Portland murder chart and comment with "add making guns readily and easily available and legal to carry" bolded here just like you did there. And then you come back after this comment about Portland murders and say "Absolutely nothing I've posted is about Portland or Open Carry". In effect you said the bold about Portland murders and then say you didn't. Trying to have your cake and eat it too but it just didn't work out for you. "But it usually works, darn" you might say. Maybe next time. Facts are stubborn things. mspart mspart

And you can kiss electrical energy good bye. And your job. And your way of life. And your computers. mspart

And that my friends is what I have been talking about. If you are a favored class you get the stuff, you don't get prosecuted, etc. If you are not, then you don't get the stuff and you may get prosecuted for what the favored are not prosecuted for. mspart

We are blessed for sure. mspart

We use algae? mspart

It would be proportional I'm sure. That's what this argument is all about. Israel can kill no more than 1200 and capture no more than 300. Then they have to back off or get international condemnation. There's 2 million Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. Even if the number of Palestinian dead was 100k, that would not represent genocide. mspart

Well said. mspart

Define genocide. mspart

Why? mspart

I'd say it is more sane than voting for a alzheimers guy who as Hur said has a not too good memory. I guess I think it is better to vote for a leader than the people who tell the guy what to do when how to say it. Again, I can understand you not wanting to vote Green etc, but to vote for a guy who cannot lead because he is impaired does not sound like a good choice to make. That really is voting for micky mouse in my opinion. But I don't want to continue this. People vote for who they are going to vote for. As long as voting is still a thing, a vote is good. mspart

I can understand you don't want to vote for Trump. But why not vote for someone other than Biden? Green, Libertarian, Socialist, Unified (Manchin), etc. You are saying you'll vote for someone who cannot lead and therefore has to have others tell him what to do and what to say and what to sign? In other words, you are voting to be led by un-elected appointees rather than by the person you voted for. And that is a sane position? mspart

History informs us of the direction we are going. Yes I bring up Hillary because she was caught red handed and nothing happened to her. Biden was caught red handed with classified info he had no right to. He got a pass. Trump was caught red handed and gets the book thrown at him. I'll tell you why. Comey said Hillary did it but that no reasonable person would prosecute, even after destroying subpoenaed evidence. Hur said Biden did it and should be liable but was so amiable, kind hearted and so forgetful that no jury would find him guilty. Is that the level of judicial reasoning you are comfortable with? Trump is generally hated by the system so he gets no such consideration. It's because of who he is, and not what he did. The others got off because of who they are and not because of what they did. History informs us of what is happening in the present. Those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat it. Let history go? That is the tactic of someone who doesn't have a concrete position from which to argue effectively. Rather than put out reasoned rhetoric, the attack is personal. The last gasp of a lost cause. mspart

I'll type it again very slowly so you can understand. I am not fighting for Trump, I do not want him to run for President. Less Trump the better. What I am upset about, and I made clear in my post, is the bastardization of the judicial branch to be a clearing house for corruption. I find this very corrupt. A DA that ran on getting Trump no matter what. Can't find a criminal code worthy so goes the civil route. A Judge who clearly had it out for Trump and this was apparent from the beginning. A DA that will not prosecute felons but will prosecute Trump. Another DA that filed RICO against Trump and hired her lover for large sums of money that she participated in and expected to - corruption. A DOJ prosecution for classified papers that only applies to Trump, not Biden or Hillary. They get a pass because they are of the right persuasion and not Trump. I hope you are seeing a pattern here. Justice is supposed to be blind but seems to favor those that are favored and not for those that are not. This is also seen in every city where police arrest and the DA does not prosecute for some woke reason or judges do not hear the cases because the perp is the wrong race, gender, or is a homeless drug addict. There is a terrible issue of the justice system focusing on the perp and not the victim. It is not that I am concerned for Trump, I am concerned about our nation as a whole. We cannot survive long with a justice system that picks winners and losers based on who they are or who they are not, and not by what they have done and apply the law to that. Did I type that out slow enough for you? mspart

What Trump EOs was Biden blocked from eliminating? mspart

This is not a refutation that the government makes massive money on a gallon of gas. Federal Government makes 25 billion on gas sales alone in 2023. This does not count diesel. Shell made 28 billion for 2023. So who is the evil here. The oil producer or the federal government. They roughly make the same. mspart

And he tried on others and courts blocked the action. Also public info. mspart

So how do they determine if a person is an illegal immigrant. Heck I could cop an accent and get my 10k. and then do it again and get another 10k since there is no fraud control. Heck I could just keep on doing it and get 100k. Then the money runs out and the gravy train stops. This is just plain foolhardy. Legitimate question: Why shouldn't I get the 10k (speaking as the average Joe in NYC)? I work, I pay taxes and I am paying for these people. I want my tax money back. Give me some. Why should they get free room, board, and 10k? mspart