jross

Which of these are true?

A leftist signaled this was already occurring. The critics said BS. The Twitter files confirm the serious risk of big tech influencing elections. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Epstein Testimony.pdf

Cool. I thought you might believe in the 2016 Russia Collusion hoax. You didn't say that so there's how my own bias shows.

You know the Steele dossier was fake and funded by the Clinton campaign, right?

I go on an annual fishing trip with a childhood friend, a good man, and a Democrat (same guy :)). Stuck in a cabin for four days, we discuss social issues and character and agree on the big picture on most issues. In 2020 I was satisfied with Trump's policies but Trump was getting murdered on social media and in the news for his character. This changed my opinion to where I disliked Trump enough to look past his policies and vote against his character. As time passed, social media became so toxic from the left side, with what I guessed was banned/suppression from the right, that I grew sick of the "we the democrats." My friend was not like this but my social media changed to this. The entire mass of democrat complainers canceled out Trump's behavior, and I voted for more of Trump's policies and economy.

Deflect, deflect, deflect. Biden's people influenced the employees at multiple big tech companies in an attempt to sway an election through one-sided information suppression, and Biden won. What if Trump had won the election, and you discovered big tech was 99% Republican influence rather than Democratic influence?

Skip to the 42s if you must. This is surprisingly good guitar music.

Trump doesn’t actually demand the constitution to be thrown away. He is asking what should be done. It’s very similar to what democrats asked in 2016. It’s ambiguous what to do. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-happens-if-the-election-was-a-fraud-the-constitution-doesnt-say/amp/

Musk paid a ridiculous amount of money to reveal a serious concern about the power and misuse of information control. That misuse should be a bipartisan concern. Beware that next time it could be used against you.

That's All! Three others have medaled at each of U23, Junior, and Cadets. Which one made a World team as well?

Who is the other one?

Again and again, O'Toole is a magician.

Unrolled https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1598853816874831872.html

How soon would you allow brand-new wrestlers to compete in a varsity tournament? My local school has new girls wrestling varsity tournaments after a few days of practice, and I don't understand how this is good for retention. Should they hold off on competition until a certain status of technique, etc., is reached?

Mr. Basketball. The front page has several articles that are simply reporting the facts, as you say. There is also a biased article coming from the CNN Wire. https://www.kwwl.com/news/national/hate-speech-dramatically-surges-on-twitter-following-elon-musk-takeover-new-research-shows/article_909eb974-60ba-52e9-a1d3-9f13b16b1ec1.html

My previous research didn't clarify the PV article, and I'll look later. When researching that story originally and today, an overwhelming amount of stories focus on how PV is deceptive and skip the part of what is revealed. They describe how PV gets footage and interviews through deceptive practices (lying about who they are and what they believe in). They carry over that deceptive behavior to wrongly label PV's material as phony. If you look past how PV gets their videos and listen to leftists tell their own story, I hope it repulses you. As PV has grown in popularity, they are getting more whistleblowers telling the story, which is different from getting materials through deception.

More crack pot studies. https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased

Here is the left's activist. The Undercurrent https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfWDu0q3Ep7JXCcZor6l5Cg

I'm incredibly grateful for PV and its findings, regardless of their deceptive methods in achieving it. Have you read what the Wikipedia founder says about Wikipedia bias being far-left? https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/

What is the left's comparison to Project Veritas? It's biased to the right. It uses real video recordings of people to support its journalism. Everywhere I read about PV stories on social media, there is a leftist army that is completely dismissive of what their eyes see.

None that I've found. Sites like these are promising, and then you look; the most unbiased news is still biased when you read it. https://www.allsides.com/media-bias Just the facts are unprofitable. One must read the shit on both sides and form their own opinion.

Bo Maynes was an undefeated 4 timer with a 130-0 record that was never taken down in high school. He made the NCAA tournament once and was backup for several years at Oklahoma.

Mine was Olympic champ and high school champ because Kansas did not have D1 college wrestling. I won a state championship at 8 years old in the 80s and didn't much care one way or the other. I dreamed bigger when meeting Senior World Teamers at the youth tournament avenue. The big USA flag. The real-life action figure standing in front of their poster with muscles bulging from a low-cut singlet. Watching the local high schoolers wrestle was also exciting. My entire family watched the Olympics every four years. None of us watched NCAAs or Worlds (perhaps no media coverage) Melvin Douglas, Kenny Monday