VakAttack

I initially read it as him saying there was nothing "appearing" about it, he definitely hit the kid. Seeing how y'all read it, I could definitely see that. My default is Mineo is a tool, so...

100%. I think it's a fair criticism of most politicians, including Harris. I just think it looks worse when you have Trump out hear hurling extremely personal attacks at you, your family, your height, your name, etc., and then you come groveling back to him. Not that it looks good on the "regular politicians," just that it looks way worse and weaker when it's like this. That part isn't an indictment of Trump, but on his "opponents."

Shot: Chaser:

This is true and fair, many politicians do what DeSantis did, including Kamala Harris. It's just way more embarrassing because Trump hurls personal attacks at all of them and their families and their penis sizes (looking at you, Marco Rubio) and THEN they bow down and kiss the ring. Biden didn't do anything like that to Harris.

1. https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-gop-voters-lawsuit-disqualifying-trump-colorado-ballot-supreme-court-2023-12 2. It was not one judge, it's 5 so far. 3. There's obvious legal foundation, it just depends now on how SCOTUS interprets the 14th Amendment.

Blaze did nothing in the first 5 minutes, Franek essentially did nothing in the last two. Awful to watch.

The refs get so caught up in the 5 count on top they forget about regular stalling. Franek's ride was a pure stall. That's the stuff we need to legislate out of the sport.

Will Joey Blaze be joining this match at some point?

They didn't boo him after the match until he did the Gladiator "are you not entertained" pose. He wanted it, he got it.

Booing the perceived lack of action during a match is different than booing the athlete after the conclusion of the match, the fans are responding to different things.

I've been to the NCAA tournament multiple times, and multiple events in different parts of the country. It's every fan base. Whatever your preferred team is, they're no better, there's just fewer of them.

Nice to see Voinivich attacking, though obviously an outmatched opponent.

You're criticizing sports fans for being sports fans. They root for their teams and against their opponents.

Welcome to watching wrestling, where home fans call for stalling very quickly.

Great. Today is a new day. What a weird attempt to criticize. "Wow, if they were real fans they would cheer for the guy who just beat their wrestler."

Lol, he took one shot in that match. Not that Drake did a whole lot either.

Not any more than normal. He only got booed because he begged for it.

How so?

It didn't affect the match in any way, but the out of bounds stall call was very inconsistent there. Ramos dove out of bounds. Again, doesn't really affect the outcome.

Factually incorrect? The statement about Dems removing Trump from ballots on a whim is factually incorrect. The situation in Colorado was primarily Republican driven and certainly not a whim. The statement about going through DNC chairs is presumably correct, I don't know. The middle three sentences are mostly opinion, so not factually incorrect, but disagree with two of them, and agree with one (about handpicking Hillary over Bernie).

No, the judge objected to the proposed immunity offered to Hunter. Judge's typically have no authority over what charges a person faces from the prosecutors, but can refuse to accept the terms of an agreement. Some federal courts allow for full on plea agreements, but many of them basically just allow for "recommendations" with the judge having the final call on a sentence. I'm not entirely certain which type of jurisdiction Hunter was in then or is in now; I practice at a state level. Now, in a real world setting, judges can...make their displeasure known, which can have effects in the different offices, but if a prosecutor wants to drop a charge, the judge can not stop them.

He did make that argument when asked. You not liking a question doesn't make it irrational. You can try to drag this into a semantics debate all you want, just keep ignoring what Trump said about "crossing a line." Nothing bad ever happens when we just ignore things.

1. Dake had no redshirt, but Cael did. True, but Dake also had two losses in what would have been his redshirt freshman year, whereas Cael obviously was undefeated. His two losses were to Donnie Vinson (who went 0-2 at NCAAs) and Kevin LeValley (who took 7th). If Dake had been undefeated his last 4 years of college, this would be more a point in your favor. 2. Uhh...neither was Cael, the four time NCAA OW. He bonused his way to the finals as a freshman, bonused his way through the whole tournament as a sophomore including a major in the semis over Eggum, the only guy to hold him to a decision at the NCAAs as a freshman, bonused his way to the finals again as a junior, and finally bonused his way through the whole tournament again as a senior. 3. Not as dominant before the NCAAs or at the NCAAs. Dake had 9 total bonus point wins at the NCAAs. Cael had 18. Again, see above. The redshirt argment might hold more weight with me if Dake had gone undefeated his last three years of college. He didn't. He lost to Donnie Vinson as a sophomore (0-2 at NCAAs that year) and Kevin LeValley (7th place that year).