Offthemat

Are dog whistles.

Which dialect was wrong? Muslim, muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, or Palestinian?

I can’t imagine where you get your news, but Id bet you can perform a search - just don’t use gugel. But there have been numerous requests and subpoenas for records that the DOJ and FBI wouldn’t turn over, some even went to the point of contempt charges being threatened.

Just some recent examples: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-takes-broad-view-religious-rights-key-cases-2022-06-21/

Godwin’s law?

You’re not wearing blinders, you’ve got your eyes, and mind, closed. If you get different verdicts based on trial venue, then it’s not a fair trial. Federal law is Federal law, except in DC.

Jordan and Comer have been obstructed at every step, and now McCarthy is out of the way. Stay tuned.

He gave a good speech.

Id like to have seen them move those NYC and DC trials to Lawton, OK and see how they turned out.

“Most assuredly, and failed to register with FARA, also.” This is pertaining to the Podestas. In the meantime, 40 FBI reports showing bribery and corruption by biden family. Investigation shut down. No SWAT teams. Nothing to see here, folks.

You’re missing it on the parking lot bombing.

He didn’t sell it to him. What would he want to buy polling data for. He showed it to him in aspiration of being hired, like it was a portfolio - here’s what I’ve done, and you should hire me. He was about as much Ukrainian as Russian. Not a lot of difference, you know. Most assuredly, and failed to register with FARA, also.

Again, blinders. What did Manafort do that the Podesta brothers didn’t do?

You might enjoy this one, too: https://rumble.com/v3roe84-rep.-tim-burchett-if-you-dont-see-gods-hand-in-this-then-youre-not-paying-a.html

Evidence of blinders, here. Corruption? Not even close. Each one has an example of a dimocrat action or activity that matches but was handled differently.

And churches.

SWAT arrest of Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Mark Houck, the raid on Mar-a-Lago, the murder of Craig Robertson, to name a few examples. Every charge/indictment of Donald Trump.

That’s certain to be one of your fallacies, changing the emphasis and meaning of the term ‘respecting.’ You’ll have to look up which one. It’s well known that the Court has been wrong in numerous of its rulings. But historically, from the beginning of this country, the government has contributed to religious establishments without establishing a State Religion. And the Court has rarely found it to be in violation of the Constitution. The one that allows freedom of religion, not seclusion from religion. By your implications, NGOs and non-profits (that don’t pay taxes) would be excluded for the off chance they would benefit a particular group, when that is often the goal. The situation has simply never been as you describe.

I’d say three - you’re keeping count.

In case it’s not clearly obvious to you, nobody believes you. Being you freely admit being a communist, marxist, do you also admit being a Nazi, or will you just decline to deny it?

No need to feel lonely, lots of opinions got blown away yesterday.

Do you condemn hamas?

I was addressing the claims that it was a moment of magnificence when biden withdrew from Afghanistan and some points about why we were so invested.