ionel

well if we throw out that silly Woods match then we are 01-11-11 through regulation remember the good ole days where ties were allowed

this Woods guy is the real deal and might change things up

01 11

nope

has there every been an entirely binary dual meet?

0-1 ... wait ... did they start at HWT

no Lee, or maybe he is bumping up

you aren't suggesting programs with million$ of club money are cheating, now are you?

Maybe they should bump him up to 133 tonight to get a workout ... nah ... not gonna happen.

What will be the most interesting aspect of the meet? Will Lee wrestle, will he gas again?

I'm not, see above.

Hey now ... my father was right, mom was obtuse and I'm acute, can't help it, its in the genes, I've never been off by 90 degrees.

My friends call me acute and thats Mr. Acute to you sir!

But how do you know that? The "article" does not indicate such.

gopher fodder

We still don't know the context of the quote. Is this the way Manning talks, in short seperate sentences, or is this the way Exstrom writes? "They did not work with us." What does that mean, are they required to, should they? "They made a statement." Ok sure but what statement? Also: "Manning revealed ... three times" or "WI AD ... refused to work with NU three times?" Its really not possible to tell from this writing. If Manning has a beef with WI AD then why isn't NU AD taking the lead in dealing with this issue, where is the NU AD statement or for that matter any official statement?

But if it is, no one can see it or read it.

Then let's see the full article.

Yeah we've seen that over and over, you said there was an "article where quoted" suggesting someone interviewed him not just some random forum fan saying he heard something.

tag team?

reference link?

Does the wife work for the university?

NIL can't make up for the 0.1? get out of here