jross

I agree with the gullible. There is direct evidence of controlling the flow of information on the news, social media, and search browsers to make one side look better and shut down the other. That is unfair at best and interference at worst. Election rigging is already proven in court. Janet here got a slap on the wrist for it.

Ruin Thanksgiving in five words

Some folks maintain humanity by rejecting opinions, rejecting personal experiences, and dismissing cited sources while offering 'judgment' in return.

$5K is cheap for fans with money. Baseball memorabilia says, "Hold my beer."

What discussion on the forum made you reconsider your stance on a particular topic? What about the conversation or the perspectives shared by other members led to a change of mind?

It's challenging. For most of us, to question one's opinion is to question one's identity. It feels like violence. Taking on a new opinion is to take on a new identity.

Epstein is apples and oranges, but it applies to the potential for significant consequences to powerful people. JFK is a closer comparison. Similar to the JFK assassination, the Election Fraud conspiracy suggests government involvement in a deliberate change of leadership (at worst) or a concealment of facts (at minimum).

Trump managed to convince 57% of democrats? Wow! Those suckers fell for it. /s

I’m thinking about the JFK files as context to withholding information. Epstein files are a more recent example.

This opinion data surprises. The survey of 1,000 U.S. Likely Voters was conducted on February 26-28, 2023 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/61_believe_feds_helped_incite_capitol_riot Is humanity easier to maintain when the majority of folks agree on concern?

Let’s imagine there is evidence of election fraud. Like say for example this was proven true. Should the government admit it? Would it admit it? 48 Laws of Power (book) has the answer.

Guess who's here BB appears Frustrated by the facts, it's clear.

This isn’t difficult to find. https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/81_million_votes_nearly_half_say_no_way

Haha. Just reported in quotes what Democrats took credit for. Read it yourself.

In between waiting… https://www.meatchurch.com/blogs/recipes/texas-twinkies Smokers early thanksgiving. Grateful for the luck of being born in the USA, the resilience to overcome hardships, a wife that gives everything to our family, and my in-laws for great times. My kids are like thankful for… blah me:

There is a lot in there. Democrats take credit in their own words. “a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.” Republicans call it rigging the election while Democrats call it fortifying the election. To me, it’s an admission to the strategy behind what we saw with big tech and media controlling information… amongst other questionable activities to help Biden win.

It’s his brother. The video is 11 years old. I posted because the special move is entertainment.

Remember? https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

Regardless of presentation, delicious! https://www.meatchurch.com/blogs/recipes/smoked-shotgun-shells

It took 30 minutes or less to gather context and discern meaning, but the 'professional' press will not do it, and some of y'all are reluctant as well. Why is that?

Good God.

It's a bad post regardless of context. The Hitler part is easy to dismiss since Eric doesn't talk about Hitler in the actual tweet, and this is further supported in the tweets surrounding it. Example: https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1725208466036294013 https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1725210514530119928 Where is the word 'all' in front of Jewish Communities? The context of which Western Jewish Communities is in the surrounding tweets. Examples below.

Enthusiastic is the wrong word choice. The post is dismissive and critical.

The total number of votes did not follow historic patterns... We've had high-stakes elections before. We've had political mobilization before. So what caused such a high number of votes? Were there more citizens? [ yes ] Were there more registered voters? [ yes ] Did a higher number of registered voters actually vote? [ yes, by ~5% compared to 2016!] During a pandemic where citizens are told it is unsafe to be around people, more votes than ever before were cast by a wide margin. Built from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2022/demo/p20-585.pdf According to Rasmussen Reports, 49% of voters agree with the statement, "There is no way Joe Biden got 81 million votes in the 2020 election. Perhaps the most surprising revelation was that those who agreed with the statement included 31% of Democrats and 45% of voters who chose not to identify with any political party, compared to 72% of Republicans. It is not surprising that the Rasmussen Reports conducted a survey of 1,051 U.S. Likely Voters on June 25-27, 2023... found that 66% of Likely U.S. Voters are concerned that the outcome of the 2024 presidential election will be affected by cheating.