PortaJohn

Curious between the two (Carroll/Merrill) which one will have to suck down to '97 to stay in the lineup moving forward after the '24 season.

There's nothing like Sunday afternoon drinking

Well yeah, that's already in the works

Not happening

You're joking right?

It's official. Hendrickson to Okie State. Just has that vibe Alirez is next

JB informed me. Scrolled up and saw the chap from Wisconsin beat you to it. But that's still a L' for you. You're supposed to be the Uetake guy

I'm extremely shocked you didn't say Yojiro Uetake

Bosak lost his jr year I think to one of the Nelson twins and senior year to Jake Kemerer. Both were studs

Ed Ruth

I'd start here National Wrestling Hall of Fame 405 West Hall of Fame Avenue Stillwater, OK 74075 Phone: (405) 377-5243 Email: info@nwhof.org

I find this interesting because Brooks made a statement about being surprised it took this long to leak. Curious who the mole was inside the PSU network.

@poorwrestler fly is kinda a Nelson Mandela, MLk, Gandhi figure on these boards. Some say even a Mother Teresa. Is it possible to commute Fly's sentence. For the sake of all our sanity?

When do you get to change your pic? It's throwing me off

You are certainly the nail to locks hammer

MSU is on HR/GIA. Arguing with everyone and anything he can find. No idea where TBAR went. Some say he's in Zihuatnejo. It's in Mexico. A little place on the Pacific Ocean. They say it has no memory. That's where he went to live the rest of his life. A warm place with no memory.

I miss the TBAR (PSU fan) vs MSU (now Iowa fan?) battles

I'm assuming wkn would answer like myself and say, "we do not have all the info and facts so we do not know". That's called a measured balanced approach to this situation. But you, you know. He's a liar

When you read "establishing intent' they use specific literature that allows as much wiggle room as possible. "Significant Flexibility", "athlete's declaration is considered powerful evidence". The problem with this AB scenario is the little info we have. He stated he declared it, did not provide a prescription, had lawyers file it and was cleared the Thursday prior to competition and allowed to wrestle. Everything else at this point is speculative.

No. I'm assuming he's fine and when he disclosed the vyvanse on the DCF form the DCO officer asked him for the prescription and he didn't have it. Hence, his statement in the interview. But im just speculating & @Interviewed_at_Weehawken is certain he's lying

Reading more into USADA he seems safe. Brining the prescription doesn't matter but having one and him disclosing it shows transparency. Establishing Intent Inadvertent rule violations are relatively rare, but they are possible, and when they do occur they are typically the result of medications or supplements that have been insufficiently researched before using them and which contain a prohibited substance. Significant flexibility has been built into the system to try to ensure that inadvertent rule violations are addressed with less severe sanctions. An athlete can usually qualify for a reduced sanction if they are able to determine the source of his or her positive test and establish a lack of intent to cheat. This is where a properly completed disclosure of medications and supplements used by the athlete can become so important. The starting point for obtaining that flexibility in the event of a positive drug test is often whether the athlete has made a full and complete declaration of substances used on their doping control form. Frequently, where the athlete has declared a supplement or medication which later turns out to be the source of the positive test, the athlete’s declaration is considered powerful evidence of the athlete’s intent to comply with the rules and leads to a finding that the athlete has not intended to cheat. On the other hand, when an athlete fails to disclose a substance on their doping control form and tests positive, the failure to disclose can cast doubt on the athlete’s efforts to demonstrate that they were seeking to comply with the rules and this many result in a longer period of ineligibility. Therefore, it is always in an athletes’ best interest to declare all of his or her supplements and medications – both prescription and non-prescription – during every sample collection process. Here are just a few more of the reasons why athletes should declare every product, every time

This is straight from the USADA website: The DCO and athlete will complete sample collection forms together, either hard-copy or digitally, to document the circumstances of the sample collection process. Additionally, In accordance with the instructions on the doping control form (DCF), the athlete should declare any substance or medication they may have taken on a Declaration of Use Form. They should also provide details of any Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs) they may have on file.