ThreePointTakedown

That is an answer to a question but not the one asked. Near miss. And, btw, no they don't.

Thank you for answering, I appreciate it. Do the 'repeat' abortions that you mentioned consist of those done with mifepristone? Also, what does it matter that there are repeat abortions? How does this effect you or America? And what are your 'restrictions' and how might your approach vary from Texas's restrictions that led to this: The Texas Supreme Court ruled in Zurawski v. State of Texas on May 31, 2024, refusing to clarify the exceptions to the state’s abortion bans. The court rejected claims brought by 20 women who were denied abortions despite dire pregnancy complications. In this case do the restrictions work in your opinion? Let's go one by one: "too stupid/lazy" that's an argument for/against lots of things, we can get into those later tho. Not sure you will be happy that you typed that if those topics ever come up. But you feel they are smart enough to go through a multi step process, by design in most states to make it as cumbersome as possible, that may take several days with multiple visits. Possibly hundreds of miles from where they live and costing from hundreds to thousands of dollars in total cost. I'm sorry but it seems like you're trying to make the point they are too stupid to avoid getting into the situation and smart enough to get out of it. I reject your premise. This is too far fetched to be an honest opinion. "they know full well" - you have no credibility to say this. You want this to be true for some reason. If it was, you would be able to find data about it. Do you know how many studies and surveys have been done on this topic? You have access to so much info that could support your opinion and you site, 'I think people do this' as your best evidence for holding your opinion. That's just sad. Just say why you actually believe this, because this isn't it. It can't possibly be this lazy. Wait... yes it can. My bad. As lazy and uninformed as this opinion is about abortion, it makes sense that you think people are as uninformed about sex and contraception as you are. You actually think people are willing to go through ALL THE ABOVE, on a regular basis, rather than pay for condoms or get birth control through the ACA or health insurance or local clinics? Why do you think they would do this on purpose, to own the Cons? Again, that would track.

Do I? Have I articulated that? Please explain what you have read or that I have typed to connect those dots?

What I get from this is: 'I can't reconcile what you said with what I said, so I'm just going to move these goal posts so I don't have to confront that fact.'

Yes your whatabout-ism abounds. That you weren't precise with your words is not my fault. Could an argument be made that Putin waited until after his friend was out of the Oval Office to invade precisely because Putin preferred 45? Look I just made it. Bush II, horrible president, horrible human being, decent painter(shoulda went with that first and we would all be better off) won a second term on the backs of two wars and a terror attack(that the administration had been warned about ahead of time and ignored, but let's not get distracted). Couldn't a war or proxy war with Russia help Biden win a second term? An argument, that I am making now, could suggest it. GOP threatening not to send aid to Ukraine was a horrible strategy and blew up in their faces several times. The 10/7 happened. Now things start getting real. Bibi, notoriously in favor or GOP leadership. And, again, trying to buy time from their own legal troubles waiting for him on the other side of this.

Thanks for the name calling. You're really helping your cause. Could you be more of a cliche? I'm sorry. I thought you understood that you were talking about the founding of the country. They had little confidence in non; white, land owning, men. That's how we got 2 senators, 3/5's, and the electoral college. The question was, how do you figure that THAT was what the founders had in mind or were worried about. I think most of them were racist bastards. Much of their wisdom can be thrown on the ash bin of history and forgotten. Because more than zero of them probably had syphilis and that stuff messes with your head after awhile. We live in a different time. No longer worried about the English invading or the French invading or the Dutch invading or Native Americans reclaiming the land we stole from them. We have more wealth and food and production capacity to support our population if we choose to. But we don't. You know why? Because a good portion of us are either; racist bastards or cynical pricks that can't stand the next generation getting a better deal(yell at clouds). So you know what we do? We vote against our own better interests and instead try to punish our perceived enemies(or just call them names when we feel triggered and can't regulate our emotions) Rather than voting to have universal health care and education. Instead we fill public pools with cement so that 'those' people can't use them too. Your arguments for not helping people and just being 'left alone' is a round about way of rationalizing greed and fear. And what we crave most is community. So if more people agree to be greedy and fearful with you, you don't feel so bad for being greedy and fearful of nothing! And I'll bet you probably give some of your money to those people that churn up pointless things for conservative people to fear: immigrants, lesbians, immigrants, trans people, immigrants, immigrants, globalists, and immigrants. Did I miss any? Thanks this was cathartic. Lets do it again.

Do you see everyone as an enemy in one way or another? If so, why is that?

I take it you disagree. Or was it so funny how simple it is that you didn't think of it till just now?

Do you think everyone in Hamas willingly joined? I don't. These groups there are always some that either join young and grow out of it or are forced by outside pressure. I'll bet you can name a group that had people charged and executed for war crimes that said, 'I was just following orders' Do you have any idea what happens to a body during a pregnancy? Those health related restrictions/complications, I'm sure you'll define in detail in the future, ARE pregnancy. A person's body is never the same after going through 9+ months of gestation. It's dangerous to the pregnant person and the fetus. The list of health related restrictions to getting an abortion should be begin and end with: Pregnancy. If you want to keep people from using it as contraception or whatever you really mean, because you have refused to go into detail as to what you mean by that. You're just trying to punish people for not having the same ethics or morals as you. I wish you could just come out and say it. Because your reason makes no sense, as it stands right now. But if you want to define in explicit detail what you mean by 'abortion as contraception', I'll bet you won't, then we can actually have a conversation about that. Until you state your position, you have no position. I'll wait for you to take offense at something I wrote so you can avoid answering the question you've dodged several times.

Putin is the leader of Russia. There is plenty of evidence that showed in 2016 Russian interests, for which Putin is the leader(where does the buck stop?), paid for commercials on FB and other platforms to dissuade Hilary voters in swing states. Kushner admits it happened. https://www.npr.org/2019/04/24/716374421/fact-check-russian-interference-went-far-beyond-facebook-ads-kushner-described

"I don't believe he would do it." is what 45 said after being asked if/why Russia/Putin meddled in the election to help get them elected. Of course an intelligence officer wants a weak minded moron that fawns all over him, to be in the oval office(talking about 45, now). Any chance Putin waited for an opportune time so they could effect our politics more and get the person they wanted in the oval. 'Putin didn't invade Ukraine.' I hope that was a typo. Because they did. twice. 'I don't believe... proxy war.' I'm glad you think you're right and everyone else is wrong. However, if you don't have evidence, and I haven't seen any that should be compelling, you have no reason to hold that belief. 'Peace through strength' is this V for Vendetta. Not everyone is our enemy and should be treated as such. I'm sure you understand that most people just want to be left alone and not hassled. People in Gaza were being hassled for decades. I don't agree with their tactics but when you get squeezed there is always a breaking point. Lets listen to conservatives talking about 2nd amendment solutions. They feel they are being squeezed. Are they, really? No. Not to the extent that people in Gaza have/were/are. They just have that victim card their religion has programmed them to play every time someone pushes back against their dumbass ideas. Like 'Peace through strength'. I'm pretty sure a long haired hippie from Jerusalem would have issues with that statement.

What is your definition of terrorist? Because what I suggested is talking before it gets to that point. Are you against that too? Does everyone in Hamas think that way? Is there anyway to know the answer? I would guess they don't all believe the same thing as we know in similar organizations that some people feel trapped and afraid for their lives. Follow orders but do not believe the entire ideology or the organization. So right there you are painting everyone, again, with a broad brush. Labeling them evil and making it easier for yourself to wish/hope for their deaths. Negotiations save innocent lives. As much as you might want to bomb everyone because you feel they tacitly support the organization in question. You would probably, I could be wrong, also say that one abortion is too many. My question: why the double standard?

Other than 'just trust me', do you have evidence of this? 2016 Putin/Russia worked really hard to get 45 elected. Your turn.

And thus probably not going to get a conviction. So Hur wouldn't be able to convince a jury, so they dropped it. Because, they know if they tried and failed, which they admit would happen, they would have no career afterwards. Rationalization abounds. Keep trying.

Trivial occurrence not reported by all of MSM except for the one org that has a financial incentive to keep them relevant. Can't wait to see that headline.