nhs67 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Oklahoma 125 - Jordan 133 - Schwartz 141 - Belton 149 - McDougald 157 - Carlson 165 - Sax 174 - Picklo 184 - Parker 197 - Buchanan 285 - Mora That is a solid lineup, gents. 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killdozer Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 (edited) 10 minutes ago, nhs67 said: Oklahoma 125 - Jordan 133 - Schwartz 141 - Belton 149 - McDougald 157 - Carlson 165 - Sax 174 - Picklo 184 - Parker 197 - Buchanan 285 - Mora That is a solid lineup, gents. If Schwartz makes 133 I will be surprised. Also, Doesn't round of 12 Heindselman have one more year? Edited May 17 by killdozer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Just now, killdozer said: If Schwartz makes 133 I will be surprised. Also, Doesn't round of 12 Heindselman have one more year? A ) Heindselman can pound sand. B ) Mora followed Kish with the intention to start after his Redshirt. C ) Trying to fit these three gents in to the lineup: - Schwartz just announced he was returning to Oklahoma for his final season of eligiblility - McDougald announced he was transferring there from Lehigh - Belton just announced he was transferring there from Oregon State The only way one of them doesn't sit is if Schwartz or Belton drop to 133lbs. The same can be said for Carlson, Sax, Picklo and Parker from 165-184lbs. The only way at least one of them doesn't ride pine is if Carlson drops to 157 and either Picklo or Sax make the drop to 165lbs. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPhillips Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 5 minutes ago, killdozer said: Doesn't round of 12 Heindselman have one more year? He does... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winners Circle Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 32 minutes ago, nhs67 said: Oklahoma 125 - Jordan 133 - Schwartz 141 - Belton 149 - McDougald 157 - Carlson 165 - Sax 174 - Picklo 184 - Parker 197 - Buchanan 285 - Mora That is a solid lineup, gents. I think it's more likely Belton goes 133 than Schwartz. Seems like Schwartz's 133 days are long gone. He's been at 141 for 2 years now. And I am pretty certain he transferred out of UNCO because he knew Alirez was dropping to 141 and he wanted to go 141 himself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheJimReaper Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 3 hours ago, nhs67 said: A ) Heindselman can pound sand. B ) Mora followed Kish with the intention to start after his Redshirt. C ) Trying to fit these three gents in to the lineup: - Schwartz just announced he was returning to Oklahoma for his final season of eligiblility - McDougald announced he was transferring there from Lehigh - Belton just announced he was transferring there from Oregon State The only way one of them doesn't sit is if Schwartz or Belton drop to 133lbs. The same can be said for Carlson, Sax, Picklo and Parker from 165-184lbs. The only way at least one of them doesn't ride pine is if Carlson drops to 157 and either Picklo or Sax make the drop to 165lbs. McDougald has never been at Lehigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 My guess for Oklahoma 125: Jordan 133: Barreto 141: Belton vs Schwartz 149: loser of 141 vs McDougald 157: loser of 149 vs Wiley 165: Carlson vs Schubert 174: Sax vs Picklo 184: Parker 197: Buchanan 285: Heindselman vs Mora Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 (edited) 1 hour ago, TheJimReaper said: McDougald has never been at Lehigh. I am an idiot. This is known. Not sure why I was thinking all excitedly and got McGonagle (133/VT) all mixed up. Edited May 18 by nhs67 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheJimReaper Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 5 minutes ago, nhs67 said: I am an idiot. This is known. Not sure why I was thinking all excitedly and got McGonagle (133/VT) all mixed up. You’re all good man. Happens to the best of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poorwrestler Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 Oklahoma 125 - Jordan 133 - Schwartz 141 - Belton 149 - McDougald 157 - Carlson 165 - Sax 174 - Picklo 184 - Parker 197 - Buchanan 285 - Mora That is a solid lineup, gents.If Carlson and Sax can make those weights I’ll eat my left shoe Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheJimReaper Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 28 minutes ago, poorwrestler said: If Carlson and Sax can make those weights I’ll eat my left shoe Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Did Sax have a huge growth spurt? Wasn’t he at 149 last year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poorwrestler Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 Did Sax have a huge growth spurt? Wasn’t he at 149 last year?Yes and yes. If he could’ve made 165 last year at NDSU I believe he would have. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 17 minutes ago, TheJimReaper said: Did Sax have a huge growth spurt? Wasn’t he at 149 last year? Yes and No. Sax has been at 174 for two years now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 1 hour ago, poorwrestler said: If Carlson and Sax can make those weights I’ll eat my left shoe Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk How do they get everyone in the lineup otherwise? "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 I don’t see Belton making 133. If anything I could see him going up to 149. Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 10 hours ago, nhs67 said: How do they get everyone in the lineup otherwise? Picklo is the odd man out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 19 minutes ago, JimmyBT said: Picklo is the odd man out. He has owned the series against Sax aside for a single decking. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 20 minutes ago, Idaho said: I don’t see Belton making 133. If anything I could see him going up to 149. Then a hole at 133lbs. Unless Jordan goes there. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 (edited) 37 minutes ago, nhs67 said: He has owned the series against Sax aside for a single decking. Sax is a handpicked kish kid. Picklo was there when he got there and IMO has regressed as a wrestler. Plus I don’t see Sax making 165. Also I think IF Picklo can get to 165 he’ll beat Carlson. Edited May 18 by JimmyBT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 1 hour ago, nhs67 said: Then a hole at 133lbs. Unless Jordan goes there. They have to have some sort of plan there for bringing all these guys in and Schwartz coming back. Don't they still have Lorenzo on the roster as well? He was a 2x NQ at Poly. Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumper Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 On 5/13/2024 at 8:35 PM, SunDevil said: I don’t think Teemer is gone. I see Larkin at 157 and Teemer at 165. Sucks fur McClane. Really liked how well he was wrestling at the end of the year. Gives them nice depth though. Pretty much what I was thinking as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 1 hour ago, Thumper said: Pretty much what I was thinking as well. 143lb, 65 KG Larkin? No. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 (edited) 2 hours ago, JimmyBT said: Sax is a handpicked kish kid. Picklo was there when he got there and IMO has regressed as a wrestler. Plus I don’t see Sax making 165. Also I think IF Picklo can get to 165 he’ll beat Carlson. He could have regressed all you want, he still isn't as good when they both have taken the mat (when it matters). Sax isn't very big. Not sure why you think he can't make 165lbs. Especially with Carr and O'Toole no longer at the weight, it makes 165lbs make much more sense. This was February. Edited May 18 by nhs67 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 (edited) 16 minutes ago, nhs67 said: He could have regressed all you want, he still isn't as good when they both have taken the mat (when it matters). Sax isn't very big. Not sure why you think he can't make 165lbs. Especially with Carr and O'Toole no longer at the weight, it makes 165lbs make much more sense. This was February. Sax. Getting better. Round of 12 Picklo. Went from NQ to .500 record I hope Picklo beats him out. Just don’t see it happening. Sax is very lean that’s why. Edited May 18 by JimmyBT 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 31 minutes ago, nhs67 said: He could have regressed all you want, he still isn't as good when they both have taken the mat (when it matters). Sax isn't very big. Not sure why you think he can't make 165lbs. Especially with Carr and O'Toole no longer at the weight, it makes 165lbs make much more sense. This was February. To me when it matters is during the BiG 12 and NCAA tournament 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now