Jimmy Cinnabon Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 (edited) Given that he will have beaten so many higher seeds (by seeds he will have to beat the 8 Kemp, 1 Lewis, 4 Griffith and 2 Devos), including two former NCAA champs AND been one of the lowest seeds to win a NCAA title? How can that not be a shoe in for OW, if it happens this way? It would be a true underdog story! Edited March 14 by Jimmy Cinnabon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgaveMaria Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 How do you go through life totally ignoring reality? 1 ” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodRound Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 My vote for OW goes to you, Jimmy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchapman Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 You forgot first at-large bid to place 1st. 1 Craig Henning got screwed in the 2007 NCAA Finals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphTJones Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 If either MM or O'Toole win 165 & finish the season undefeated and don't get OW id be flabbergasted. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 7 minutes ago, RandolphTJones said: If either MM or O'Toole win 165 & finish the season undefeated and don't get OW id be flabbergasted. not gobsmacked? 2 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAC Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 29 minutes ago, AgaveMaria said: How do you go through life totally ignoring reality? Maybe his parents are on this year's seeding committee? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanut Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 It would indeed be a feel-good story to see an injured kid who needed an at-large bid win it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truzzcat Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 I think Keegan/MM winning that weight would outdo him or Trent beating brooks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul158 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 31 minutes ago, RandolphTJones said: If either MM or O'Toole win 165 & finish the season undefeated and don't get OW id be flabbergasted. 165 is the Premier weight this year. All the top wrestlers are healthy and ready for battle. The winner should get outstanding wrestler award. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul158 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 13 minutes ago, Truzzcat said: I think Keegan/MM winning that weight would outdo him or Trent beating brooks. agreed. 197 in general not a very deep weight. 174 is not that deep and some of the top guys are not 100 percent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Cinnabon Posted March 14 Author Share Posted March 14 44 minutes ago, peanut said: It would indeed be a feel-good story to see an injured kid who needed an at-large bid win it all. Tiny Carter Starocci. Limping his way to an at large bid and NCAA title win. So inspiring. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadzaev2 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Did Medicine Man get commissioned to do the above photo??? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 4 hours ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said: one of the lowest seeds to win a NCAA title? Not even close to lowest seed to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 14 minutes ago, ionel said: Not even close to lowest seed to win. OK, in the spirit of @cowcards and his daily trivia, 24 unseeded wrestlers have won an NCAA title, but the lowest seeded wrestler to win was a #13 seed. Can you name that wrestler? There has also been one #10, one #11, and one #12. Bonus points if you can name them. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crotalus Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 OK, in the spirit of [mention=16]cowcards[/mention] and his daily trivia, 24 unseeded wrestlers have won an NCAA title, but the lowest seeded wrestler to win was a #13 seed. Can you name that wrestler? There has also been one #10, one #11, and one #12. Bonus points if you can name them.Cody Brewer was the 13 seed. And he dominated his way through the bracket. He should have been seeded much higher, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crotalus Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 I think MM would have to absolutely dominate his half of the bracket, which he is capable of doing (and then beat O'Toole, of course), to have a chance at OW. Reluctantly agreeing with JC that Starocci's path is actually set up for an OW run with two former champs in the way. O'Toole's path is difficult enough to compete with that depending on who is more... outstanding... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 27 minutes ago, Crotalus said: 29 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: OK, in the spirit of [mention=16]cowcards[/mention] and his daily trivia, 24 unseeded wrestlers have won an NCAA title, but the lowest seeded wrestler to win was a #13 seed. Can you name that wrestler? There has also been one #10, one #11, and one #12. Bonus points if you can name them. Cody Brewer was the 13 seed. And he dominated his way through the bracket. He should have been seeded much higher, though. Well done. 1 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPhillips Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Crotalus said: There has also been one #10, one #11, and one #12. Bonus points if you can name them. The 11 was Myles Martin 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Can we just all agree: Jimmy is wrong! again 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 8 minutes ago, MPhillips said: The 11 was Myles Martin 2016. Nice. Now we just need those even numbers. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragit Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 6 hours ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said: Given that he will have beaten so many higher seeds (by seeds he will have to beat the 8 Kemp, 1 Lewis, 4 Griffith and 2 Devos), including two former NCAA champs AND been one of the lowest seeds to win a NCAA title? How can that not be a shoe in for OW, if it happens this way? It would be a true underdog story! Wrong. Next stupid question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchapman Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 12 seed was Jarrod King Craig Henning got screwed in the 2007 NCAA Finals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCinnabon Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 (edited) 14 hours ago, ionel said: Not even close to lowest seed to win. I still think if the 9 seed wins they are the OW unless a lower seed wins it all this year. If Carter wins he has to be OW in this scenario. Edited March 15 by JimmyCinnabon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCinnabon Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 17 hours ago, jchapman said: You forgot first at-large bid to place 1st. When you combine this with being the 9 seed and an at-large I think if Carter wins it's a no brainer. He has to be OW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now