1032004 Posted March 1, 2024 Share Posted March 1, 2024 Swimming, apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 1, 2024 Share Posted March 1, 2024 On 3/1/2024 at 9:46 PM, 1032004 said: Swimming, apparently Expand I am embarassed for swimming. 2 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted March 1, 2024 Share Posted March 1, 2024 Hate it when this stuff happens. There is going to be some heat...and justifiably so. Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul158 Posted March 1, 2024 Share Posted March 1, 2024 On 3/1/2024 at 9:46 PM, 1032004 said: Swimming, apparently Expand Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedFan Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/1/2024 at 11:47 PM, Paul158 said: Unbelievable. Expand The guy who was disqualified changed lanes before all swimmers had finished. That's a no-no. There's no judgment allowed on the official's part; do you want it to be a judgment call as to whether anyone in another lane was affected? The correct response by the winner of a heat is to remain in the lane until everyone is finished; maybe hang on the lane line to congratulate the swimmer in the next lane. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 1:10 AM, BigRedFan said: do you want it to be a judgment call as to whether anyone in another lane was affected? Expand Yes 1 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedFan Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 1:18 AM, Wrestleknownothing said: Yes Expand Rather than the simple and obvious "don't do that"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanOfPurdueWrestling Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 1:24 AM, BigRedFan said: Rather than the simple and obvious "don't do that"? Expand How prominent is this rule? I know next to nothing about swimming, but if everyone knows is strictly forbidden until the race is finished he deserves it. If it’s sorta obscure and maybe he didn’t know then that’s on the NCAA, coaches. And the student-athlete to make everyone aware. Anything that is an instant DQ should not be toyed with. With all that said I do feel for the kid, he didn’t interfere with anyone and let the accomplishment of a lifetime take over his critical thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1032004 Posted March 2, 2024 Author Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 1:10 AM, BigRedFan said: The guy who was disqualified changed lanes before all swimmers had finished. That's a no-no. There's no judgment allowed on the official's part; do you want it to be a judgment call as to whether anyone in another lane was affected? Expand It occurred after the race was over, including the lane he went into, so kinda, yeah. This seems comparable to the high school “taking down your singlet straps” rule (although at least it’s just a team point and not a DQ). It can be called a lot more than it is even though it’s technically “no judgement allowed” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedFan Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 (edited) On 3/2/2024 at 2:29 AM, 1032004 said: It occurred after the race was over, including the lane he went into, so kinda, yeah. This seems comparable to the high school “taking down your singlet straps” rule (although at least it’s just a team point and not a DQ). It can be called a lot more than it is even though it’s technically “no judgement allowed” Expand The race isn't over until the last person in the heat finishes. You can't leave your lane, neither by going into another lane nor by getting out of the pool. This rule *ensures* that nobody interferes with any other swimmer. No judgment needed. You don't do it. Make no mistake: I feel for him. Edited March 2, 2024 by BigRedFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 (edited) Would it have been ok if they'd celebrated beow water going under instead of over the lane divider? Edited March 2, 2024 by ionel 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedFan Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 3:48 AM, ionel said: Would it have been ok if they'd celebrated beow water going under instead of over the lane divider? Expand I thought this part was pretty clear: Quote You can't leave your lane, neither by going into another lane nor by getting out of the pool. Expand Rule 2.5.1.b: A swimmer who changes lanes during a heat shall be disqualified. https://swimswam.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/NCAA-Swimming-and-Diving-Rules-Book-2021-2023.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:03 AM, BigRedFan said: I thought this part was pretty clear: Rule 2.5.1.b: A swimmer who changes lanes during a heat shall be disqualified. https://swimswam.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/NCAA-Swimming-and-Diving-Rules-Book-2021-2023.pdf Expand So whats the controversy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:03 AM, BigRedFan said: I thought this part was pretty clear: Rule 2.5.1.b: A swimmer who changes lanes during a heat shall be disqualified. https://swimswam.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/NCAA-Swimming-and-Diving-Rules-Book-2021-2023.pdf Expand That is not what they cited. They said he was disqualified for interfering with another swimmer. That part of the rule reads: "Any competitor who interferes with another swimmer during a race shall be disqualified from that race, subject to the discretion of the referee." If ever there was a time for discretion it was then. 2 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedFan Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:07 AM, ionel said: So whats the controversy? Expand Seems like people don't understand that the swimmer broke a clear rule, most likely unintentionally, and that the official on deck should not have enforced the rule since it appears that no other swimmer's race was affected. I guess "no harm, no foul" is the thinking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:14 AM, BigRedFan said: Seems like people don't understand that the swimmer broke a clear rule, most likely unintentionally, and that the official on deck should not have enforced the rule since it appears that no other swimmer's race was affected. I guess "no harm, no foul" is the thinking? Expand See the bolded part above 1 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:12 AM, Wrestleknownothing said: That is not what they cited. They said he was disqualified for interfering with another swimmer. That part of the rule reads: "Any competitor who interferes with another swimmer during a race shall be disqualified from that race, subject to the discretion of the referee." If ever there was a time for discretion it was then. Expand hmm ... but didn't appear he interfered with any other swimmers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:18 AM, ionel said: hmm ... but didn't appear he interfered with any other swimmers. Expand Exactly Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedFan Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:12 AM, Wrestleknownothing said: That is not what they cited. They said he was disqualified for interfering with another swimmer. That part of the rule reads: "Any competitor who interferes with another swimmer during a race shall be disqualified from that race, subject to the discretion of the referee." If ever there was a time for discretion it was then. Expand I'm curious as to who "they" are who you are citing and where the citation is to be found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:22 AM, Wrestleknownothing said: Exactly Expand But he did change lanes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:22 AM, BigRedFan said: I'm curious as to who "they" are who you are citing and where the citation is to be found. Expand Read the very first post in this thread. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:23 AM, ionel said: But he did change lanes. Expand Re-read my post. I already addressed this. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:25 AM, Wrestleknownothing said: Re-read my post. I already addressed this. Expand It appears either the conference officials were misquoted or they don't know the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedFan Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 On 3/2/2024 at 4:24 AM, Wrestleknownothing said: Read the very first post in this thread. Expand Not exactly authoritative, is it? A tweet by a reporter (I guess) quoting an unnamed official. Which do you think is more likely: 1.a was officially cited without any other swimmer actually being interfered with, and nobody reviewed and overruled what would be an obvious discretionary correction; or 1.b was cited as an obvious infraction occured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. PeanutButter Posted March 2, 2024 Share Posted March 2, 2024 A bunch of old timers discussing a swimming race on a wrestling board. There was no misciting. The "interfering with a swimmer" rule is a well known rule that has multiple parts to it. Part "b" states: "A swimmer who changes lanes during a heat shall be disqualified." the swimmer in question entered the lane line of his teammate, who finished 2nd, while the rest of the field hadn't finished the race yet. Automatic DQ. I learned the same painful lesson years ago after finishing a 500 yard freestyle race Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now