Wrestleknownothing Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 7 minutes ago, ionel said: Good stuff but do you have a projection table on who might still be without assuming two more duals and conference tourney? The conference tournaments do not matter for RPI purposes as the pre-allocation spots are determined prior to the tournaments. Then the tournaments can be used to fill the spots. It is only dual and tournies prior to 2/26 that count. So anyone sitting on 12 or fewer matches will probably need to pick up a tournie somewhere to get to 15. Scanning I see: DeAugustino, Figueroa, and Trombley at 125, Arujau, Fix, Schriever, Rini, and Madrigal at 133, Vasquez, and Carlson at 141, Gomez, and Gioffre at 149 Lewan, and Lee at 157 no one at 165 Starocci, Lewis, Mocco, Turley, Wolak, Eischens, and Sparks at 174 Truax, and Howard at 184 Brooks, and Elam at 197 Kerkvliet, Schultz, Pitzer, Luffman, Gordon, and Tinker at 285 2 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 minute ago, Wrestleknownothing said: The conference tournaments do not matter for RPI purposes as the pre-allocation spots are determined prior to the tournaments. Then the tournaments can be used to fill the spots. It is only dual and tournies prior to 2/26 that count. So anyone sitting on 12 or fewer matches will probably need to pick up a tournie somewhere to get to 15. Scanning I see: DeAugustino, Figueroa, and Trombley at 125, Arujau, Fix, Schriever, Rini, and Madrigal at 133, Vasquez, and Carlson at 141, Gomez, and Gioffre at 149 Lewan, and Lee at 157 no one at 165 Starocci, Lewis, Mocco, Turley, Wolak, Eischens, and Sparks at 174 Truax, and Howard at 184 Brooks, and Elam at 197 Kerkvliet, Schultz, Pitzer, Luffman, Gordon, and Tinker at 285 Surber? Good list, glancing at it one can pick out the guys who aren't gonna care about a RPI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 9 minutes ago, ionel said: Surber? Good list, glancing at it one can pick out the guys who aren't gonna care about a RPI. Yes, Surber too. I was looking at the Intermat rankings which have him 11-3, but 4 of those were against non-D1 and won't count for RPI. So I am sure there are others. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 49 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Yes, Surber too. I was looking at the Intermat rankings which have him 11-3, but 4 of those were against non-D1 and won't count for RPI. So I am sure there are others. BTW: surprised you had no comment on "dual" definition in other thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 57 minutes ago, ionel said: BTW: surprised you had no comment on "dual" definition in other thread. You know I love some word play, so I am ok either way. One thing I said above needs to be corrected. RPI is also one possible criteria in the at-large qualification process. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 2 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: You know I love some word play, so I am ok either way. One thing I said above needs to be corrected. RPI is also one possible criteria in the at-large qualification process. But I forgot, is it needed to qualify spots let's say for someone like Surber? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 minute ago, ionel said: But I forgot, is it needed to qualify spots let's say for someone like Surber? Not necessarily. From the NCAA selection criteria grid: A wrestler needs 8-matches to trigger winning percentage standard. A wrestler with less than 8 matches would not be eligible for the winning percentage and RPI which means they could not meet 2 of the 3 standards. A wrestler DOES NOT need 15 matches to earn an pre-allocated spot for the conference, if the wrestler meets the threshold in winning percentage and coaches rank. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Not necessarily. From the NCAA selection criteria grid: A wrestler needs 8-matches to trigger winning percentage standard. A wrestler with less than 8 matches would not be eligible for the winning percentage and RPI which means they could not meet 2 of the 3 standards. A wrestler DOES NOT need 15 matches to earn an pre-allocated spot for the conference, if the wrestler meets the threshold in winning percentage and coaches rank. Yeah he is right at 70% but has Buchanan and Glazier remaining so lose to either and drops below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted February 15 Author Share Posted February 15 Some guys have also changed weight - Like Olguin who has 5 matches right now... Also Braxton Brown went up. Not sure about others who are in that position. Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D3UC157 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 On 2/11/2024 at 10:18 AM, Idaho said: I believe we should have a new ranking and the RPI come out this week - Anyone have the actual date on that? 02/15/2024 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted February 16 Author Share Posted February 16 3 hours ago, D3UC157 said: 02/15/2024 Thanks man appreciate it! 1 Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now