jajensen09 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Who do you got? Nebraska matches up decent against Michigan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 20-16 Mich wrestle stat has 16-16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jajensen09 Posted February 6 Author Share Posted February 6 (edited) 125 Smith W 133 Van dee W 141 hardy W 149 Ridge W 157 Robb W 165 ?? 174 Griffith W 184 pinto W 197 Alllred W 285 Davison W Will be interesting to see if lineups are full. Bonus opportunities for nebraska would be Ridge, Pinto, Allred. Bonus opportunities for Michigan Griffith and Davison. Might see some ducking I'm this dual Edited February 6 by jajensen09 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyBT Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 125 - Mich 3 133 - Mich 3 141 - Mich 3 149 - Neb 3 157 - Neb 3 165 - Mich 3 174 - Mich 3 184 - Neb 3 197 - Neb 3 HWT - Mich 3 Michigan 18 Nebraska 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 If all starters go, with how they have been wrestling, this is what I have... 125 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 3-0 Wrestlestat: 3-0 Nebraska 133 Michigan over Nebraska via Major UofM 7-0 Wrestlestat: Tied 3-3 141 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 10-0 Wrestlestat: 6-3 Michigan 149 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 13-0 Wrestlestat: Tied 6-6 157 Nebraska over Michigan via Decision UofM 13-3 Wrestlestat: 9-6 Nebraska 165 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 16-3 Wresltestat: Tied 9-9 174 Michigan over Nebraska via Major UofM 20-3 Wrestlestat: 13-9 Michigan 184 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 23-3 Wrestlestat: Tied 13-13 197 Nebraska over Michigan via Decision UofM 23-6 Wrestlestat: 13-18 285 Michigan over Nebraska via Major UofM 27-6 Wrestlestat: 18-17 Nebraska I used their last starters as their starters (for Wrestlestat purposes), which means Striggow at 197 and Walker at 184 for Michigan and Hutmacher for Nebraska. The rest are basically whoever has been wrestling there for them for most matches. I think Michigan takes it to them just like they did Iowa. I don't know if Bullock will be back in the lineup, or why he was out. If Rogers is in against Allred at 197 instead, it is still likely bonus. Allred is big and Rogers is made for 184lbs. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbone Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 125 Mich dec. 3-0 133 Mich MB 7-0 141 Neb dec. 7-3 149 Neb dec. 7-6 157 Neb dec. 7-9 165 Mich dec 10-9 174 Mich MD 14-9 184 Neb dec 14-12 197 Neb dec. 14-15 HWT Mich MD 18-15 I have it 5 matches to 5 but bonus points the difference. Nebraska could steal 125 but Michigan can steal 141, 149 and 157 from my prediction so more margin for error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanMogen Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 It’s tough. Sean Bormet has to head coach Michigan and Virginia Tech at the same time. I imagine he’ll focus on this dual instead of his VTech dual against Duke that on the same night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jajensen09 Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 On 2/6/2024 at 10:07 AM, Dogbone said: 125 Mich dec. 3-0 133 Mich MB 7-0 141 Neb dec. 7-3 149 Neb dec. 7-6 157 Neb dec. 7-9 165 Mich dec 10-9 174 Mich MD 14-9 184 Neb dec 14-12 197 Neb dec. 14-15 HWT Mich MD 18-15 I have it 5 matches to 5 but bonus points the difference. Nebraska could steal 125 but Michigan can steal 141, 149 and 157 from my prediction so more margin for error. Is cam amiene a go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 On 2/6/2024 at 8:16 AM, nhs67 said: If all starters go, with how they have been wrestling, this is what I have... 125 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 3-0 Wrestlestat: 3-0 Nebraska 133 Michigan over Nebraska via Major UofM 7-0 Wrestlestat: Tied 3-3 141 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 10-0 Wrestlestat: 6-3 Michigan 149 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 13-0 Wrestlestat: Tied 6-6 157 Nebraska over Michigan via Decision UofM 13-3 Wrestlestat: 9-6 Nebraska 165 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 16-3 Wresltestat: Tied 9-9 174 Michigan over Nebraska via Major UofM 20-3 Wrestlestat: 13-9 Michigan 184 Michigan over Nebraska via Decision UofM 23-3 Wrestlestat: Tied 13-13 197 Nebraska over Michigan via Decision UofM 23-6 Wrestlestat: 13-18 285 Michigan over Nebraska via Major UofM 27-6 Wrestlestat: 18-17 Nebraska I used their last starters as their starters (for Wrestlestat purposes), which means Striggow at 197 and Walker at 184 for Michigan and Hutmacher for Nebraska. The rest are basically whoever has been wrestling there for them for most matches. I think Michigan takes it to them just like they did Iowa. I don't know if Bullock will be back in the lineup, or why he was out. If Rogers is in against Allred at 197 instead, it is still likely bonus. Allred is big and Rogers is made for 184lbs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jajensen09 Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 10 minutes ago, ionel said: Be interesting if he wrestles tonight. He is getting honored at senior night. We shall see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 great way to kick off the weekend. looking for close matches with lots of action and victories by underdogs - as always. happy friday chaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Caleb Smith and DeAugustino are very different. Smith is super quick and slick - DeAugustino is a scrambler, a rider, doesn't create his own offense much, but scores on reattacks and Smith has a high motor who may provide opportunities to do so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanMogen Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 That wasn't a takedown. I have evidence to support this from just last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Smith needs to use his motor as an advantage - and strategize for stall calls agaisnt DeAuggy from neutral Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 I'm rooting for Caleb Smith here. Let's get a quick escape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanMogen Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, flyingcement said: I'm rooting for Caleb Smith here. Let's get a quick escape I cannot support that beard. Also pulling for Smith. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pawrestler Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Smith is looking good 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 wow - great reversal. I'm a big Smith Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Keep going Smith! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 here comes the funk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanMogen Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Deaugustino's beard and Surtin's neck brace will make me cheer against them every time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Great win for Caleb Smith - the fans love it. Bodes well for a good dual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Expectations for Van Dee are basically - keep it close - maybe give him a scare and make sure to avoid bonus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Van Dee is a scrappy kid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanMogen Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Van Dee is underrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now