Ohio Elite Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 9 minutes ago, Elevator said: going to have to veto this Overriden, bye Jimmy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 DDM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VakAttack Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 125: Ayala DEC Davis 133: Nagao DEC Schriever/Teske 141: Woods DEC Bartlett 149: Kasak DEC Rathjen/Voinivich 157: Franek DEC Haines 165: Mesenbrink DEC Caliendo 174: Starocci DEC Kennedy 184: Truax MDEC Riggins 197: Brooks MDEC Glazier HWT: Kerkvleit MDEC Hill PSU 24-9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIV4GOD Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 It will be Iowa's worst defeat in its history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohio Elite Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 7 minutes ago, LIV4GOD said: It will be Iowa's worst defeat in its history. Anybody happen to know Iowa's worst defeat ever? That would be interesting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildTurk Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 (edited) 35 minutes ago, LIV4GOD said: It will be Iowa's worst defeat in its history. How much do you know about history? Edited February 5 by WildTurk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 2 hours ago, Elevator said: going to have to veto this - we need posters on here. think of some other stupid bet There are over 2k posters on here... we can manage. Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 1 hour ago, Ohio Elite said: Anybody happen to know Iowa's worst defeat ever? That would be interesting. If only wrestlingstats.com still worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgaveMaria Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 3 hours ago, nhs67 said: They have the ability to see and ban specific IPs. They know if Dipshit Cinnatwat is someone else and who specifically it is. One problem with this. We have five different people who use this computer. Saves us 44 miles driving to get to the Public Library to use theirs. ” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinnacle Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 4 hours ago, nhs67 said: I'm not going to bet now because it would put me in agreement with dipship Cinnatwat. I concede that you win. What did I lose? + for coming up with "dipship Cinnatwat". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threadkilla Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 6 hours ago, Grecojones said: I called it in the Michigan thread aswell. I may actually have been the first to call it. I started an Iowa PSU thread before Michigan beat Iowa saying a shutout is possible. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted February 5 Author Share Posted February 5 2 hours ago, Ohio Elite said: Anybody happen to know Iowa's worst defeat ever? That would be interesting. Depends. For the 1965-66 season there were nine weight classes for duals. That was a rough one for the Hawkeyes. Dave McCuskey's team went a brutal 2-7-2 with 0-32 losses to both Michigan and Minnesota and a 0-39 loss to Oklahoma State. In the ten weight era there have been 2 twenty point losses. A 9-29 loss to Iowa State in the 1972-73 season and the previously mentioned 10-30 loss to Oklahoma State in the 2003-2004 season. 1 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 46 minutes ago, AgaveMaria said: One problem with this. We have five different people who use this computer. Saves us 44 miles driving to get to the Public Library to use theirs. I speak for everyone when I say this: If you knowingly harbor that dipshit, then you deserve every bit of the IP ban that he does. 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Depends. For the 1965-66 season there were nine weight classes for duals. That was a rough one for the Hawkeyes. Dave McCuskey's team went a brutal 2-7-2 with 0-32 losses to both Michigan and Minnesota and a 0-39 loss to Oklahoma State. So with 10 weights in duals it might've been 0-45. Really wish wrestlingstats still worked. Believe this was the era of different weights at the tournament. I remember coffee discussion with Ron Clinton about bumping up ~20+ lbs for NCAA Jr year (due to added wt class at tourney) and then won it the next year as Sr with a messed up hand injury. Edited February 6 by ionel 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted February 6 Author Share Posted February 6 Iowa's worst lose to PSU happened twice. First in the 2016-17 season (11-26) and again the following season (13-28). 1 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted February 6 Author Share Posted February 6 37 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Depends. For the 1965-66 season there were nine weight classes for duals. That was a rough one for the Hawkeyes. Dave McCuskey's team went a brutal 2-7-2 with 0-32 losses to both Michigan and Minnesota and a 0-39 loss to Oklahoma State. In the ten weight era there have been 2 twenty point losses. A 9-29 loss to Iowa State in the 1972-73 season and the previously mentioned 10-30 loss to Oklahoma State in the 2003-2004 season. Oops. Oklahoma, not Oklahoma State. Those three losses in 65-66 were part of a four match losing streak where they were outscored 9-120. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAC Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 125: Ayala Dec over Davis 3-0 Iowa 133: Nagao Dec over Schriever 3-3 141: Woods Dec over Bartlett 6-3 Iowa 149: Rathjen Dec over Kasak 9-3 Iowa 157: Franek Dec over Haines 12-3 Iowa 165: Mesenbrink Dec over Caliendo 12-6 Iowa 174: Starocci M.Dec over Kennedy 12-10 Iowa 184: Arnold Dec over Truax 15-10 Iowa 197: Brooks M.Dec over Glazier 15-14 Iowa 285: Kerkvliet T.F. Hill 19-15 PSU Not an Iowa fan but everyone's underselling them at home. The Arnold/Truax pick is admittedly a stretch and wildly unlikely to happen. Curious to see how Caliendo fares against Mesenbrink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 6 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Oops. Oklahoma, not Oklahoma State. Those three losses in 65-66 were part of a four match losing streak where they were outscored 9-120. There are no oops ... Bob gave you 15 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSULou64 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 (edited) Do we realistically think that both teams will put out all of their starters in this match up? My guess is that each team holds back at least 1. I say the Hawks hold back Glazier and PSU holds back Davis. My reasoning would be an undefeated Glazier gets the 2 seed in the BigTen and pretty much get a chance to surprise Brooks in the finals having no prior experience with him. With Davis' win over D'agustino, and D'agustino win over Ayala if Davis wins his matches against Rutgers, Nebraska and Edinboro, very doable, he will be the #2 seed with an easier path(maybe even a bye) to the quarterfinals. Anyone else have any thoughts on this? You have to pick at least 1 from each team and why it would make sense. Edited February 6 by PSULou64 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 6 minutes ago, PSULou64 said: Do we realistically think that both teams will put out all of their starters in this match up? My guess is that each team holds back at least 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrestle87 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 7 minutes ago, PSULou64 said: Do we realistically think that both teams will put out all of their starters in this match up? My guess is that each team holds back at least 1. I say the Hawks hold back Glazier and PSU holds back Davis. My reasoning would be an undefeated Glazier gets the 2 seed in the BigTen and pretty much get a chance to surprise Brooks in the finals having no prior experience with him. With Davis' win over D'agustino, and D'agustino win over Ayala if Davis wins his matches against Rutgers, Nebraska and Edinboro, very doable, he will be the #2 seed with an easier path(maybe even a bye) to the quarterfinals. Anyone else have any thoughts on this? You have to pick at least 1 from each team and why it would make sense. This is a very smart comment, and I agree both coaches, and all top coaches have moved beyond the concept that dual meet performance is anything other than tertiary window dressing. Yeah, it's nice to win at home, but the whole schedule, as well as the way coaches structurally and competitively manage their seasons, is so overweighted for March, that I wouldn't be surprised to see this outcome either. As part of the structural thing, I think its important to note that being a college wrestling coach seems to be a much more year-round position than it was in it was ten years ago. A lot more press and hype is given to getting college age guys to medal at age-group worlds or to make senior teams than it used to be. Overall I think this is a great thing, but I believe the best coaches now budget their wrestlers' mileage on a 12 month basis rather than a 4-month basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 The system as it stands will reward Beau Bartlett for ducking the match vs Woods which is a shame. Bartlett undefeated and Mendez and Woods each with a loss - means that Bartlett should get 1 seed and the 2/3 between the other two guys. This then plays into their national seeding and so on. I hope Bartlett wrestles and will gain respect for him by putting himself out there when strategically he wouldn't need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. PeanutButter Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 (edited) 39 minutes ago, PSULou64 said: Do we realistically think that both teams will put out all of their starters in this match up? My guess is that each team holds back at least 1. I say the Hawks hold back Glazier and PSU holds back Davis. My reasoning would be an undefeated Glazier gets the 2 seed in the BigTen and pretty much get a chance to surprise Brooks in the finals having no prior experience with him. With Davis' win over D'agustino, and D'agustino win over Ayala if Davis wins his matches against Rutgers, Nebraska and Edinboro, very doable, he will be the #2 seed with an easier path(maybe even a bye) to the quarterfinals. Anyone else have any thoughts on this? You have to pick at least 1 from each team and why it would make sense. Totally sound logic but I really, really hope we don't get any ducks. If it were to happen, I can see either team sitting their 141 pounder. Bartlett has more of a reason to since he presumably has the 1 seed on lock but the chatter on line is that Woods has been sick and possibly dealing with a minor injury so I wouldn't be shocked if the Brands sit him to let him gel. Mind you, I'm not confident in the validity of this chatter. It could just be excuse making. One could also argue that Gabe not wrestling at 174 is a duck variant given his prior online comments. Edited February 6 by Mr. PeanutButter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. PeanutButter Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 7 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said: I have lobotomized MrPB in, but I do not have enough info from realistic MrPB to enter. Hm. Okay let's go: Ayala, 3-0 Nagao, 3-3 Woods, 6-3 Kasak, 6-6 Franek, 9-6 Messenbrink, 9-9 Star, 13-9 Bernie, 16-9 Brooks, 19-9 Kerkvliet, 23-9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 125: Drake Ayala dec Braeden Davis 3-0 133: Aaron Nagao dec Cullan Schriever 3-3 141: Real woods fall Karl Shindledecker 9-3 149: Tyler Kasak dec Caleb Rathjen 9-6 157: Levi Haines dec Jared Franek 9-9 165: Mitchell Mesenbrink dec Michael Caliendo 9-12 174: Patrick Kennedy dec Terrell Barraclough 12-12 184: Bernie Truax major Aidan Riggins 12-16 197: Aaron Brooks dec Zach Glazier 12-19 285: Greg Kerkvliet tech fall Bradley Hill 12-24 Nittany Lions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now