Jimmy Cinnabon Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 We know 125 is a mess. But which current #1 ranked wrestler is most vulnerable? 133 - Crooham 141 - Woods 149 - McLovett 157 - Haines 165 - O'Toole 174 - Stallroci 184 - Keck 197 - Brooks Hwt - Kerk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimpeltf Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 2 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said: We know 125 is a mess. But which current #1 ranked wrestler is most vulnerable? 133 - Crooham 141 - Woods 149 - McLovett 157 - Haines 165 - O'Toole 174 - Stallroci 184 - Keck 197 - Brooks Hwt - Kerk For me to be able to properly answer your question- tell me which one you think is most likely to win... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charmon55 Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 Woods, Starocci, and Brooks have got to be the most likely to win it all out of the #1 guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCinnabon Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 (edited) 2 minutes ago, charmon55 said: Woods, Starocci, and Brooks have got to be the most likely to win it all out of the #1 guys I would throw Kerk in there as well. I haven’t seen a guy even close to him so far this season. He took apart the the number two guy at the NWCA All-Star bout. Unless Gable somehow wrestles Kerk is the HWT champ. Edited January 30 by JimmyCinnabon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charmon55 Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 1 minute ago, JimmyCinnabon said: I would throw Kerk in there as well. I haven’t seen a guy even close to him so far this season. He took apart the the number two guy at the NWCA All-Star bout. Unless Gable somehow wrestles Kerk is the HWT champ. I agree, I wouldn't be surprised if Bastida beats Hendrickson at Big 12s. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnwtwg Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 Top 3 would be Crookham (Vito and Fix), Keckeisen (the field), and O'Toole (toughest bracket by a country mile). i am an idiot on the internet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLB9 Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 14 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said: We know 125 is a mess. But which current #1 ranked wrestler is most vulnerable? 133 - Crooham 141 - Woods 149 - McLovett 157 - Haines 165 - O'Toole 174 - Stallroci 184 - Keck 197 - Brooks Hwt - Kerk In order: Crookham Haines Lovett Woods Keck O’Toole Kerk Brooks Starocci 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truzzcat Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 19 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said: We know 125 is a mess. But which current #1 ranked wrestler is most vulnerable? 133 - Crooham 141 - Woods 149 - McLovett 157 - Haines 165 - O'Toole 174 - Stallroci 184 - Keck 197 - Brooks Hwt - Kerk id go 133 (vito at his best is the best guy in the world and I think daton poses a very tricky stylistic matchup for crookham) 157 (Meyer has been my pick all year and after the mauller match I am feeling better about it wrting cklv off to the concussion although a tournament setting still scares me for him) 149 (I personally think henson and gomez are as good if not better than ridge) 165 (I think keegan may be the best wrestler in college right now besides brooks but this weight is absolutely insane) 141 (real is great but he leaves it within the margins sometimes could see someone like beau or mendez beating him or even a guy like happle when hes hot) 197 (Trent is wrestling absolutely unreal dont give him a high probability but a chance against brooks) 184 (keck beat plott in a tight but fairly convincing fashion and I think hes the second-best guy aside from potentially foca 285 (yonger and wyatt can make it interesting if healthy) 174 (weakest weight in the country + t3 p4p guy imo) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 13 minutes ago, MLB9 said: In order: Crookham Haines Lovett Woods Keck O’Toole Kerk Brooks Starocci I have nearly the same list. Nearly in that I had Crooham, Haines, Lovett, and Woods as my four most likely, but in no particular order. Everything else was the same order. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLB9 Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 17 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: I have nearly the same list. Nearly in that I had Crooham, Haines, Lovett, and Woods as my four most likely, but in no particular order. Everything else was the same order. To be associated with the wizardly wealth of statistical and wrestling knowledge that WKN possesses is one of my greatest achievements in life! Thought about putting Haines at the top, even though it pains me. Based on how he’s looked much of the year, I’m not sure he’ll even make the semis. It’ll get corrected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antitroll2828 Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 37 minutes ago, Truzzcat said: id go 133 (vito at his best is the best guy in the world and I think daton poses a very tricky stylistic matchup for crookham) 157 (Meyer has been my pick all year and after the mauller match I am feeling better about it wrting cklv off to the concussion although a tournament setting still scares me for him) 149 (I personally think henson and gomez are as good if not better than ridge) 165 (I think keegan may be the best wrestler in college right now besides brooks but this weight is absolutely insane) 141 (real is great but he leaves it within the margins sometimes could see someone like beau or mendez beating him or even a guy like happle when hes hot) 197 (Trent is wrestling absolutely unreal dont give him a high probability but a chance against brooks) 184 (keck beat plott in a tight but fairly convincing fashion and I think hes the second-best guy aside from potentially foca 285 (yonger and wyatt can make it interesting if healthy) 174 (weakest weight in the country + t3 p4p guy imo) O’toole needed 2 comeback victories this past weekend , Peyton Hall really had him dead to rights and let it slip away , meanwhile Starocci is out here burying Mekhi Lewis alive 174 has 3 national champs in it ,Starocci just seems to have lapped the field but you can’t say a weight with 3 champs is the weakest 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truzzcat Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 7 minutes ago, Antitroll2828 said: O’toole needed 2 comeback victories this past weekend , Peyton Hall really had him dead to rights and let it slip away , meanwhile Starocci is out here burying Mekhi Lewis alive 174 has 3 national champs in it ,Starocci just seems to have lapped the field but you can’t say a weight with 3 champs is the weakest Shane lost to a true freshman and was competitive with another true freshman and a backup 157lber hes not that guy anymore and mehki has long since been the guy that was a b2b finalist and national champ imo. the weight itself only has 4 AA's. The hall match is somewhat of a concern but hes always wrestled Keegan well and is having a great year Julian took the lead on Keegan but ended up getting blown out. Im not trying to take away from Carter hes outstanding and has definitely distanced himself from everyone but foca and plott moving up to 184 whitlake and kharchla getting hurt brands suspension and labs graduating definitely thinned this weight out a ton from last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrestlingRash Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 There is no chance Woods wins at 141. He wrestles too close to too many guys and will choke at NCAAs. I am thinking he ends up in the 5/6 match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 44 minutes ago, MLB9 said: To be associated with the wizardly wealth of statistical and wrestling knowledge that WKN possesses is one of my greatest achievements in life! Thought about putting Haines at the top, even though it pains me. Based on how he’s looked much of the year, I’m not sure he’ll even make the semis. It’ll get corrected I am just a guy who takes off his shoes and socks when he needs to count past 12. We need to work on getting you some better achievements. 1 1 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 2 hours ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said: We know 125 is a mess. But which current #1 ranked wrestler is most vulnerable? 133 - Crooham 141 - Woods 149 - McLovett 157 - Haines 165 - O'Toole 174 - Stallroci 184 - Keck 197 - Brooks Hwt - Kerk 1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said: I have nearly the same list. Nearly in that I had Crooham, Haines, Lovett, and Woods as my four most likely, but in no particular order. Everything else was the same order. I fly guarantee you Crooham will not win and ill even go further to say he won't even sniff AA or r12. You guys are a pair so ill let Wkn set the odds a JC the bet amount/terms. What say ye? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1032004 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, Antitroll2828 said: O’toole needed 2 comeback victories this past weekend , Peyton Hall really had him dead to rights and let it slip away , meanwhile Starocci is out here burying Mekhi Lewis alive 174 has 3 national champs in it ,Starocci just seems to have lapped the field but you can’t say a weight with 3 champs is the weakest No one says it’s the weakest. Starocci is just a lot better than everyone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1032004 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 2 hours ago, MLB9 said: In order: Crookham Haines Lovett Woods Keck O’Toole Kerk Brooks Starocci I like this but swapping O’Toole and Keckeisen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 14 minutes ago, ionel said: I fly guarantee you Crooham will not win and ill even go further to say he won't even sniff AA or r12. You guys are a pair so ill let Wkn set the odds a JC the bet amount/terms. What say ye? Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 11 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: While waiting on Jimmy (I'm sure he's counting his CinniBucks) the two of us could have a side bet: If Crooham AAs I'll change my username to pinfall wizard for one year. If Crooham fails to AA you can't use the term pinfall in any posts for an entire year. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1032004 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 43 minutes ago, ionel said: I fly guarantee you Crooham will not win and ill even go further to say he won't even sniff AA or r12. You guys are a pair so ill let Wkn set the odds a JC the bet amount/terms. What say ye? Will he qualify? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 21 minutes ago, 1032004 said: Will he qualify? I bet not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, ionel said: While waiting on Jimmy (I'm sure he's counting his CinniBucks) the two of us could have a side bet: If Crooham AAs I'll change my username to pinfall wizard for one year. If Crooham fails to AA you can't use the term pinfall in any posts for an entire year. ? JC DMed me to say he wants all that action. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 1 minute ago, Wrestleknownothing said: JC DMed me to say he wants all that action. DMed? Thought you guys hang out together at the Creamery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 6 minutes ago, ionel said: DMed? Thought you guys hang out together at the Creamery. We did until he no showed when it was his turn to pay. Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 13 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: We did until he no showed when it was his turn to pay. figures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now