Gage Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Should be a good dual. Wrestlestat has it 21-9 OSU with the swing matches basically going all OSU's way. 125 - Spratley vs Terukina 133 - Fix vs Frost 141 - Jamison vs Echemendia 149 - Williams/Alvarez vs Redding/Swiderski 157 - Travis vs Chittum 165 - Olejnik vs Carr 174 - Thompson vs Gaitan 184 - Plott vs Feldkamp 197 - Surber vs Broderson 285 - Doucet vs Bastida I have it more a lot closer depending on Swiderski's availability.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charmon55 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Kind of a hot take but I think Travis upsets Chittum 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 125 - Sprately dec Terk 3-0 133- Fix mdec Frost 7-0 141- Ech dec Jamison 7-3 149- Swiderski dec Alvarez 7-6 157- Chittum dec Travis 9-7 165- Carr dec Olejnik 10-9 174- Thompson dec Gaitan 13-9 184- Plott dec Feldkamp 17-9 197- Surber mdec Broderson 21-9 HWT- Bastida dec Doucet 21-12 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poorwrestler Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 This could be a great dual. Hope all starters go. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 13 hours ago, Gage said: Should be a good dual. Wrestlestat has it 21-9 OSU with the swing matches basically going all OSU's way.. I feel WS is off a bit here, this looks like a razor thin dual meet, at least half the matches toss ups and overall could go either way. This is old old school match up, will there be robes? Looking forward to it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offthemat Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 25 minutes ago, Gus said: 125 - Sprately dec Terk 3-0 133- Fix mdec Frost 7-0 141- Ech dec Jamison 7-3 149- Swiderski dec Alvarez 7-6 157- Chittum dec Travis 9-7 165- Carr dec Olejnik 10-9 174- Thompson dec Gaitan 13-9 184- Plott dec Feldkamp 17-9 197- Surber mdec Broderson 21-9 HWT- Bastida dec Doucet 21-12 This doesn’t add up for me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 27 minutes ago, Gus said: 125 - Sprately dec Terk 3-0 133- Fix mdec Frost 7-0 141- Ech dec Jamison 7-3 149- Swiderski dec Alvarez 7-6 157- Chittum dec Travis 9-7 165- Carr dec Olejnik 10-9 174- Thompson dec Gaitan 13-9 184- Plott dec Feldkamp 17-9 197- Surber mdec Broderson 21-9 HWT- Bastida dec Doucet 21-12 125 OSU 3-0 133 OSU 7-0 141 OSU 7-3 149 OSU 7-6 157 OSU 10-6 165 OSU 13-6 174 OSU 16-6 184 OSU 19-6 197 OSU 23-6 285 OSU 23-9 Your maths was off, my man. 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gantry Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, poorwrestler said: This could be a great dual. Hope all starters go. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Yep, should be a great one if we have full lineups. Swiderski has been banged up hasn't he? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, Offthemat said: This doesn’t add up for me. I added 165 for OSU on accident. Should be 16-15 OSU. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, nhs67 said: 125 OSU 3-0 133 OSU 7-0 141 OSU 7-3 149 OSU 7-6 157 OSU 10-6 165 OSU 13-6 174 OSU 16-6 184 OSU 19-6 197 OSU 23-6 285 OSU 23-9 Your maths was off, my man. And your correction of my math was even further off my man lol. Here goes with correct math 125 Sprat dec Terk 3-0 OSU 133 Fix mdec Frost 7-0 OSU 141 Ech dec Jamison 7-3 OSU 149 Swid dec Alvarez 7-6 OSU 157 Chittum dec Travis 9-7 ISU 165 Carr dec Olejnik 12-7 ISU 174 Thompson dec Gaitan 12-10 ISU 184 Plott dec Feldkamp 13-12 OSU 197 Surber mdec Broderson 17-12 OSU HWT Bastida dec Doucet 17-15 OSU 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 50 minutes ago, Gus said: And your correction of my math was even further off my man lol. Here goes with correct math 125 Sprat dec Terk 3-0 OSU 133 Fix mdec Frost 7-0 OSU 141 Ech dec Jamison 7-3 OSU 149 Swid dec Alvarez 7-6 OSU 157 Chittum dec Travis 9-7 ISU 165 Carr dec Olejnik 12-7 ISU 174 Thompson dec Gaitan 12-10 ISU 184 Plott dec Feldkamp 13-12 OSU 197 Surber mdec Broderson 17-12 OSU HWT Bastida dec Doucet 17-15 OSU Ah shit... wishful thinking, I suppose? 2 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 I wouldn't be surprised to see Alvarez upset Swiderski 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gage Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 I have.... Spratley over Terukina - 3-0 OSU Fix MD Frost - 7-0 OSU Echemendia over Jamison - 7-3 OSU ***Swiderski over Alvarez/Williams - 7-6 OSU, the other way around if he doesn't wrestle. Chittum over Travis - 9-7 ISU Carr over Olejnik - 12-7 ISU Thompson over Gaitan - 12-10 ISU Plott MD Feldkamp - 14-12 OSU (I think Feldkamp goes for something and Plott gets him on his back for a 4) Surber over Broderson - 17-12 OSU Bastida over Doucet - 17-15 OSU Hopefully my calculations were correct haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Gage said: I have.... Spratley over Terukina - 3-0 OSU Fix MD Frost - 7-0 OSU Echemendia over Jamison - 7-3 OSU ***Swiderski over Alvarez/Williams - 7-6 OSU, the other way around if he doesn't wrestle. Chittum over Travis - 9-7 ISU Carr over Olejnik - 12-7 ISU Thompson over Gaitan - 12-10 ISU Plott MD Feldkamp - 14-12 OSU (I think Feldkamp goes for something and Plott gets him on his back for a 4) Surber over Broderson - 17-12 OSU Bastida over Doucet - 17-15 OSU Hopefully my calculations were correct haha fly will check the math This is more like the close scored I'd expect. Edited January 26 by ionel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gage Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 45 minutes ago, ionel said: fly will check the math This is more like the close scored I'd expect. Yeah, wrestlestat is great for a ton of things, but sometimes the dual outcomes/matchups are questionable. Should be an excellent dual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingcement Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 133, 197, and 285, are the only matches that are guaranteed. Lots of possibility among the other weights 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gage Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 16 minutes ago, flyingcement said: 133, 197, and 285, are the only matches that are guaranteed. Lots of possibility among the other weights I agree, but I think Plott is also pretty far ahead of Feldkamp. 141 should be exciting too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 8 hours ago, Gage said: I agree, but I think Plott is also pretty far ahead of Feldkamp. 141 should be exciting too. Skill-wise Plott is leaps ahead of Feldkamp. Feldkamp is considerably larger, longer, and better at pinning, though. He will have a punchers chance against anyone who doesn't hold a combination of two or more of elite skill, elite speed, elite strength, or extreme length advantage on him. Example of the balance of the Top 10 I only think there are three guys he doesn't have a pinners chance against in Keckeisen, Truax, and Foca. Keckeisen is too good, Truax too long, and Foca too athletic. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corby Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 8 hours ago, Gage said: I agree, but I think Plott is also pretty far ahead of Feldkamp. 141 should be exciting too. Belton who's athletic beat Jamison I think Ech wins this one easily. I have Oklahoma st winning the dual. They win 125 133 157 174 184 197 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex1fly Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) I see an upset or two brewing in either direction. Always a homer, I want to see our new guys continue to elevate and prove themselves. Plott and Olejnik both get two top ten opponents today and tomorrow. Youch. Edited January 26 by alex1fly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 hour ago, nhs67 said: Skill-wise Plott is leaps ahead of Feldkamp. Feldkamp is considerably larger, longer, and better at pinning, though. He will have a punchers chance against anyone who doesn't hold a combination of two or more of elite skill, elite speed, elite strength, or extreme length advantage on him. Example of the balance of the Top 10 I only think there are three guys he doesn't have a pinners chance against in Keckeisen, Truax, and Foca. Keckeisen is too good, Truax too long, and Foca too athletic. Foca beat Feldkamp 8-7 in the dual. I would say he has a chance to deck him as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 52 minutes ago, Gus said: Foca beat Feldkamp 8-7 in the dual. I would say he has a chance to deck him as well. I never said he couldn't beat Foca outright. I don't think he would deck him. Mind you, every single person never has a 0% chance of being decked, so let's say it is <1% chance that Keckeisen, Truax, and Foca have at being decked. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gage Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 Williams wrestled for Okie State vs UNI and Swiderski wrestled vs Oklahoma tonight. So signs pointing to a Williams/Swiderski match, or will John Smith throw a wrench and put Alvarez in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gage Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 Whatever the decision is, I'm looking forward to this dual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 22 hours ago, nhs67 said: I never said he couldn't beat Foca outright. I don't think he would deck him. Mind you, every single person never has a 0% chance of being decked, so let's say it is <1% chance that Keckeisen, Truax, and Foca have at being decked. Truax has been pinned 12x in his college career, most of them earlier in his career ... once each the past two seasons.... Foca and Keck have never been pinned. So I am going to pull Truax down to 2%. Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now