Jump to content
  • Playwire Ad Area

CP calls out Jason Borelli


1032004

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

I felt the coach and Kozak were in line.  Pyles inserting himself was unnecessary and he comes across as his usual self (i.e. not good)

What real impact does the Flo ranking have on his team ?? Seems like someone needs some attention 

Edited by JimmyBT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JimmyBT said:

What real impact does the Flo ranking have on his team ?? 

There are only a handful of ranking services and after Intermat, Flo is the most commonly cited I tend to see.  As others mentioned, coaches probably don't feel the need to delve into the nuances between Austin Murphy and Sal Perrine, its easy to defer to the public rankings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, flyingcement said:

There are only a handful of ranking services and after Intermat, Flo is the most commonly cited I tend to see.  As others mentioned, coaches probably don't feel the need to delve into the nuances between Austin Murphy and Sal Perrine, its easy to defer to the public rankings. 

Then that’s the coaches problem not flos 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, flyingcement said:

There are only a handful of ranking services and after Intermat, Flo is the most commonly cited I tend to see.  As others mentioned, coaches probably don't feel the need to delve into the nuances between Austin Murphy and Sal Perrine, its easy to defer to the public rankings. 

Even the smallest staffs have 3-4 coaches. Good learning experience for one coach to be in charge of understanding those differences. Most on here do it with full time jobs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JimmyBT said:

Even the smallest staffs have 3-4 coaches. Good learning experience for one coach to be in charge of understanding those differences. Most on here do it with full time jobs. 

I mean fair point on the last sentence.  We all do with full time jobs.  But what is our lens? To be entertained and to predict the winners.

The lens of a coach is - how do I prepare my wrestler for that guy.  And so I feel it is less likely to view in an objective way because why would he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, flyingcement said:

I mean fair point on the last sentence.  We all do with full time jobs.  But what is our lens? To be entertained and to predict the winners.

The lens of a coach is - how do I prepare my wrestler for that guy.  And so I feel it is less likely to view in an objective way because why would he?

So then this coach either A.)  Has the time to understand it and make the comments he did OR B.) He doesn’t have the time and probably shouldn’t make the comments he did. Which do you think it is??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JimmyBT said:

Then that’s the coaches problem not flos 

As a lower profile school that is overlooked even in the best of times, I'd argue the coach is benefiting the team by being more vocal and visible.  Again, I thought the discourse between he and Kozak was completely above board.

  • Fire 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, flyingcement said:

As a lower profile school that is overlooked even in the best of times, I'd argue the coach is benefiting the team by being more vocal and visible.  Again, I thought the discourse between he and Kozak was completely above board.

Should have been done offline.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JimmyBT said:

So then this coach either A.)  Has the time to understand it and make the comments he did OR B.) He doesn’t have the time and probably shouldn’t make the comments he did. Which do you think it is??? 

I think he spends plenty of time evaluating those wrestlers, but not in a way on which he would be emphasizing where they stand in an objective historically based ranking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

As a lower profile school that is overlooked even in the best of times, I'd argue the coach is benefiting the team by being more vocal and visible.  Again, I thought the discourse between he and Kozak was completely above board.

So you agree. He’s looking for attention??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, flyingcement said:

I think he spends plenty of time evaluating those wrestlers, but not in a way on which he would be emphasizing where they stand in an objective historically based ranking 

He obviously thinks it’s wrong so he should have a reason or not bring it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, flyingcement said:

Absolutely- not for him- but for his 

1 minute ago, flyingcement said:

Absolutely- not for him- but for his wrestler

He gave no rebuttals or reasoning for why he thought it was wrong. How does he expect to get it changed without direct dialogue with the guy that did it ???  Pressuring him publicly??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JimmyBT said:

He obviously thinks it’s wrong so he should have a reason or not bring it up. 

I think there is probably a middle ground that made more sense in reality. Dropping 18 spots while remaining undefeated is odd.  Dropping some other moderate amount can be explained away by the Ventresca/Brown response which is fair to me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, flyingcement said:

I think it was just what i said: dropping so many spots (18)in the rankings while remaining undefeated.  

Who did he wrestle ?  Who did the other guys wrestle. Sarcastic shots about maybe not getting the correct info is childish 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, flyingcement said:

Whining as a pejorative for calling out what he perceived to be as an injustice against his wrestler and his program.  It's not as bad as it sounds and the world presents these situations to all of us 

What he perceived to be an injustice. Yet he gives zero rebuttal to what he thinks should have happened instead nor why??????   I’ve been presented a situation like this many times. Always handled it one on one with the other individual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

Yeah there are a couple tournaments where American is sending partial lineup but doesn't say who (perhaps just backups) so it may be that his toughest matchups before conferences are Tucker Owen's (Air Force) and Ethan Berginc (Army).  

 

Yup should also have #20 Babin of Columbia before EIWA’s

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Playwire Ad Area



  • Playwire Ad Area
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Adam Mattin

    Delta, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Stanford
    Projected Weight: 125, 133

    Grant Stromberg

    Mukwonago, Wisconsin
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Northern Iowa
    Projected Weight: 285

    Hudson Ward

    Canton, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 165

    Alex Reed

    Shikellamy, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125

    Darren Florance

    Harpursville, New York
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125
  • Playwire Ad Area
×
×
  • Create New...