Jump to content
  • Playwire Ad Area

10 Point Major Decision.


Threadkilla

Recommended Posts

 

With the 3-point take down and 4 pt near fall you have the ability to drastically change a match.   The last exchange in the Ramos v Noto match took the match from a 3-2 decision to a major in one exchange.    It was just a despiration move by Noto in a close match that on paper looks like domination by Ramos    

Edited by Threadkilla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it interesting that John Smith promoted the idea that the first takedown would be worth three points and subsequent takedowns would be two points.  He was looking for a way to reduce the number of scoreless first periods.  I wonder if it would be better that way and to only award three points for the first takedown if it occurs during the first period. 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

I found it interesting that John Smith promoted the idea that the first takedown would be worth three points and subsequent takedowns would be two points.  He was looking for a way to reduce the number of scoreless first periods.  I wonder if it would be better that way and to only award three points for the first takedown if it occurs during the first period. 

This does make a lot of sense and would encourage action early but alas, we can't confuse the fans, think about the children.  😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

I found it interesting that John Smith promoted the idea that the first takedown would be worth three points and subsequent takedowns would be two points.  He was looking for a way to reduce the number of scoreless first periods.  I wonder if it would be better that way and to only award three points for the first takedown if it occurs during the first period. 

Similar to the mid-60s anti-OSU rule of 2 for the first td and 1 for the rest. Didn't last long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Did it not last long because OSU was getting most of the first takedowns?

Not sure but the rule was instituted because OSU was getting most of ALL tds. So since they were doing that before it stands to reason they were getting most of the first tds earlier and this would have cut into the leads they were getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gimpeltf said:

Not sure but the rule was instituted because OSU was getting most of ALL tds. So since they were doing that before it stands to reason they were getting most of the first tds earlier and this would have cut into the leads they were getting.

Not just that they were getting most but they were using cut and release thus making many matches simply a takedown contest.  Others didn't like this, changed the rules so OSU beat them on the mat.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Playwire Ad Area


  • Playwire Ad Area
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Adam Mattin

    Delta, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Stanford
    Projected Weight: 125, 133

    Grant Stromberg

    Mukwonago, Wisconsin
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Northern Iowa
    Projected Weight: 285

    Hudson Ward

    Canton, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 165

    Alex Reed

    Shikellamy, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125

    Darren Florance

    Harpursville, New York
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125
  • Playwire Ad Area
×
×
  • Create New...