Jump to content
  • Playwire Ad Area

Twitter is better


jross

Recommended Posts

  On 2/9/2023 at 3:57 PM, Nailbender said:

       I don't want child porn distributed. Preventing speech that break laws or facilitates breaking the law would be a good guide. Other than that I don't understand most of your other examples?

     I don't see how having some arbitrary person or a computer program hiding certain speech is helpful in any way. You don't think society exposing it as wrong or bad would be more effective? 

 

Expand  

We see things differently.  Horse dewormer?   Russia targeting tossup districts with lies and propaganda 3 days before an election to get their choice elected?  Glorification of Hitler and Holocaust denial?   C'mon.  You can't be serious.

MOST of society rejects bad ideas, but the scale of audience differentiates it from a person on a street corner.  People who subscribe to dangerous and crazy ideas may be small in proportion but that doesn't make them small in number.

From a platform demographics standpoint, what do you think will result from free speech absolutism?

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 4:05 PM, Mike Parrish said:

There's been a lot of "Buh mah free speech" screeching on here with mentions of criminal liability and first amendment ramifications.

Twitter is a private company that can decide what they allow, outside of illegality, on their property.

I don't currently like how they're deciding things, but that's something different.

Glad to see you're not on that side of things.

Expand  

 Twitter is and has always been mostly disgusting. It has little to nothing to do with who runs it. 

 

  • Fire 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 4:21 PM, Plasmodium said:

We see things differently.  Horse dewormer?   Russia targeting tossup districts with lies and propaganda 3 days before an election to get their choice elected?  Glorification of Hitler and Holocaust denial?   C'mon.  You can't be serious.

MOST of society rejects bad ideas, but the scale of audience differentiates it from a person on a street corner.  People who subscribe to dangerous and crazy ideas may be small in proportion but that doesn't make them small in number.

From a platform demographics standpoint, what do you think will result from free speech absolutism?

Expand  

      I am serious. If you want to save the world from bad ideas, speak out against them. I don't want to decide what is misinformation for anyone else and I definitely don't want others deciding it for me.

      I'm sure Twitter's desire to moderate content on its platform is to keep it from becoming a product they don't want it to be. I see nothing wrong with that, I just don't like the previous or existing product. It's most of the worst parts of us already, even with moderation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 4:53 PM, Nailbender said:

      I am serious. If you want to save the world from bad ideas, speak out against them. I don't want to decide what is misinformation for anyone else and I definitely don't want others deciding it for me.

      I'm sure Twitter's desire to moderate content on its platform is to keep it from becoming a product they don't want it to be. I see nothing wrong with that, I just don't like the previous or existing product. It's most of the worst parts of us already, even with moderation.

 

Expand  

I understand your point of view.  People are too immature and they need supervision.  I can't imagine a more ineffective mechanism to ostracize Neo-Nazis than giving them a platform to spread their message to billions.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 5:07 PM, Plasmodium said:

I understand your point of view.  People are too immature and they need supervision.  I can't imagine a more ineffective mechanism to ostracize Neo-Nazis than giving them a platform to spread their message to billions.

Expand  

     Who will be the arbiters of the "supervision"?

      I want no less freedom for anyone else than I want for myself. The Nazi message has already been spread the world over and rejected more than accepted. Twitter won't change that.

     Your underlined sentence is shocking to me. It's a point of view that is extremely authoritarian. So much so, I can't believe you typed it. I don't think you understand my point of view at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 6:08 PM, Nailbender said:

     Who will be the arbiters of the "supervision"?

      I want no less freedom for anyone else than I want for myself. The Nazi message has already been spread the world over and rejected more than accepted. Twitter won't change that.

     Your underlined sentence is shocking to me. It's a point of view that is extremely authoritarian. So much so, I can't believe you typed it. I don't think you understand my point of view at all.

Expand  

Laws and norms of society are the primary driver.  One of which is a balance between freedom of expression and the purposeful destruction of society.  Social media can and is used to spread good messages and evil, so it is relevant to the message.

Shocking? What?  It is an acknowledgement of the human experience.  Laws, rules and regulations exist for a reason.  In every society and endeavor.  What is the inevitable result of a social media platform with zero rules?

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 6:27 PM, Plasmodium said:

Laws and norms of society are the primary driver.  One of which is a balance between freedom of expression and the purposeful destruction of society.  Social media can and is used to spread good messages and evil, so it is relevant to the message.

Shocking? What?  It is an acknowledgement of the human experience.  Laws, rules and regulations exist for a reason.  In every society and endeavor.  What is the inevitable result of a social media platform with zero rules?

Expand  

People hearing all the information and deciding for themselves is not a "purposeful destruction of society." 

As for your last question, I don't claim to know. Why don't you tell me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 6:38 PM, Nailbender said:

People hearing all the information and deciding for themselves is not a "purposeful destruction of society." 

As for your last question, I don't claim to know. Why don't you tell me. 

Expand  

The organization of klan meetings followed by cross burnings is. So is the rigging of elections.  And an endless number of others.

The result is failure of the platform and a outrageous behavior.  Criminal and otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 6:46 PM, Plasmodium said:

The organization of klan meetings followed by cross burnings is. So is the rigging of elections.  And an endless number of others.

The result is failure of the platform and a outrageous behavior.  Criminal and otherwise.

Expand  

    The klan isn't making a comeback on Twitter. Just stop. The world won't end if Twitter doesn't censor posts.

Expecting someone else to protect us from the things you're worried about is asking for trouble. To stop them we all need to stand up to them.

     You still haven't answered me. Who should decide what we all get to see and what we don't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 7:01 PM, Nailbender said:

    The klan isn't making a comeback on Twitter. Just stop. The world won't end if Twitter doesn't censor posts.

Expecting someone else to protect us from the things you're worried about is asking for trouble. To stop them we all need to stand up to them.

     You still haven't answered me. Who should decide what we all get to see and what we don't?

Expand  

Is the klan even allowed on Twitter?  You give people way, way too much credit.  There is no standing up.  That is the attention they crave.  Note that I am not saying people can't believe or express whatever they want, crazy and otherwise.  I am saying if I am responsible for a platform there are going to rules.  Teenagers bullying each other into anorexia?  Hate speech? Propaganda? Nope, nope, nope.

I've given you the best answer I can. Shorter answer is the platform itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 7:14 PM, Plasmodium said:

Is the klan even allowed on Twitter?  You give people way, way too much credit.  There is no standing up.  That is the attention they crave.  Note that I am not saying people can't believe or express whatever they want, crazy and otherwise.  I am saying if I am responsible for a platform there are going to rules.  Teenagers bullying each other into anorexia?  Hate speech? Propaganda? Nope, nope, nope.

I've given you the best answer I can. Shorter answer is the platform itself.

Expand  

Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 6:08 PM, Nailbender said:

     Who will be the arbiters of the "supervision"?

      I want no less freedom for anyone else than I want for myself. The Nazi message has already been spread the world over and rejected more than accepted. Twitter won't change that.

     Your underlined sentence is shocking to me. It's a point of view that is extremely authoritarian. So much so, I can't believe you typed it. I don't think you understand my point of view at all.

Expand  

The people who own the website.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/9/2023 at 10:59 PM, Nailbender said:

I thought we covered that? Can we stop complaining about how it's run now?

Expand  

People can complain about how someone runs a website.
That's opinion.

Stating that the previous people violated the law by running it the way they wanted, without ever citing the theoretically violated statute, is what's wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anybody see the recent stuff about him firing engineers because they're telling him the truth about how he's not as popular as he thinks he is? he threw a temper tantrum because his super bowl tweet generated less views than biden's. the new "fix" for this problem is to make the algorithm amplify his tweets x 1000.

can't imagine a more pathetic loser. he's like an old school schizophrenic roman emperor.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Playwire Ad Area



  • Playwire Ad Area
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Adam Mattin

    Delta, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Stanford
    Projected Weight: 125, 133

    Grant Stromberg

    Mukwonago, Wisconsin
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Northern Iowa
    Projected Weight: 285

    Hudson Ward

    Canton, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 165

    Alex Reed

    Shikellamy, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125

    Darren Florance

    Harpursville, New York
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125
  • Playwire Ad Area
×
×
  • Create New...