Jump to content
  • Playwire Ad Area

Is anyone on this forum a violent extremist ? Have you ever met a violent extremist personally? You are aloud to take the 5th.


Paul158

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

I would take that bet any day. She is a  very talented female. She is very good at Judo. But 18 a year old wrestler would be stronger and have the skills to defend her judo throws. Plus wrestlers naturally know submission holds.

I'm talking boxing.  I know more about that. 

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ban Basketball said:

She fights professionally.  I don't think I could have beaten her and I boxed for several years. 

If you've never done it you can't understand how good pro trained fighters are. 

I have 

And Rousey does not have one sinlge boxing match of record.

Edited by WrestlingRasta
  • Fire 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For crying out loud, the main reason there are laws and mores that protect women; the reason men teach their sons not to hit women, is because they are vulnerable to them, it isn’t fair.  It’s not right.  Unless you’re a smallish ex-amateur marxist boxer.  Then it might be fair. 

Edited by Offthemat
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

For crying out loud, the main reason there are laws and mores that protect women; the reason men teach their sons not to hit women, is because they are vulnerable to them, it isn’t fair.  It’s not right.  Unless you’re a smallish ex-amateur marxist boxer.  Then it might be fair. 

I'm not sure Ban can understand that. 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

I'm talking MMA. Which includes boxing,judo,grappling and submission holds.

And I was talking boxing, which prompted you to reply.

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

For crying out loud, the main reason there are laws and mores that protect women; the reason men teach their sons not to hit women, is because they are vulnerable to them, it isn’t fair.  It’s not right.  Unless you’re a smallish ex-amateur marxist boxer.  Then it might be fair. 

Yep, but it's not absolute,  as has been my ONLY pernt.

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL...once again, Ban using how shitty of an athlete he is to say it's okay for biological men to compete against women.

By the way the argument of "there's only 100 of them" is asinine!!  It takes ONE to beat hundreds and thousands of females...THAT is the problem!!  It's not hard if you get out of your own way and take off the "if you don't support it you must hate LGBTQ+ glasses" the extreme shoves down your throat.  A

And spare us the feeble lecture attempt of "there is a difference between sex and gender".   You are born a biological male or a biological female...period...this isn't a scientific hypothesis, it is a scientific FACT!  And spare us the genetic abnormalities of people born with both sex organs or no sex organs argument.

  • Fire 2
  • Stalling 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bigbrog said:

LOL...once again, Ban using how shitty of an athlete he is to say it's okay for biological men to compete against women.

By the way the argument of "there's only 100 of them" is asinine!!  It takes ONE to beat hundreds and thousands of females...THAT is the problem!!  It's not hard if you get out of your own way and take off the "if you don't support it you must hate LGBTQ+ glasses" the extreme shoves down your throat.  A

And spare us the feeble lecture attempt of "there is a difference between sex and gender".   You are born a biological male or a biological female...period...this isn't a scientific hypothesis, it is a scientific FACT!  And spare us the genetic abnormalities of people born with both sex organs or no sex organs argument.

But Bigrog you know its not absolute.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

LOL...once again, Ban using how shitty of an athlete he is to say it's okay for biological men to compete against women.

By the way the argument of "there's only 100 of them" is asinine!!  It takes ONE to beat hundreds and thousands of females...THAT is the problem!!  It's not hard if you get out of your own way and take off the "if you don't support it you must hate LGBTQ+ glasses" the extreme shoves down your throat.  A

And spare us the feeble lecture attempt of "there is a difference between sex and gender".   You are born a biological male or a biological female...period...this isn't a scientific hypothesis, it is a scientific FACT!  And spare us the genetic abnormalities of people born with both sex organs or no sex organs argument.

Thanks for providing the best material that I could EVER use in just three paragraphs.  LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Fire 1

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

1) you mean to tell me that you truly think there are men's and women's sports simply because of locker rooms? (please tell me you were kidding. and if you weren't i'm going to need you to go sit and the corner and think about this for a while.)

2) locker rooms by gender are going by the wayside.

I'll try one more time.

Your original question was "so why, pray tell, are there genders in sports to begin with?"

I simply answered your question (yes, it was a bit tongue-in-cheek, but still.)

To begin with, if there were no "genders in sports", they'd all be using the same locker room. (Without genders, there's no way to know which locker room to go to.)

It may take a little while for it to sink in. Take your time... you'll get it.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Offthemat said:

For crying out loud, the main reason there are laws and mores that protect women; the reason men teach their sons not to hit women, is because they are vulnerable to them, it isn’t fair.  It’s not right.  Unless you’re a smallish ex-amateur marxist boxer.  Then it might be fair. 

Yet... this post is not even remotely true. 100% wrong.

The reason men shouldn't hit women isn't because they are stronger or more likely win in a fight. Or because women are "vulnerable." That is a terrible take.

Do some more research, I'd like to think chivalry is not dead.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

...And spare us ... people born with both sex organs or no sex organs argument.

I don't get it.

If you were born with both or neither (which isn't as rare as many think - despite Faxe news dopey commentators), do you think it would be anywhere near fair to be excluded from the conversation?

Particularly since the conversation is very much about this exact group?

I'm not going to call you shallow minded - because I know better than that. But maybe you just weren't thinking when you made your post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

I don't get it.

If you were born with both or neither (which isn't as rare as many think - despite Faxe news dopey commentators), do you think it would be anywhere near fair to be excluded from the conversation?

Particularly since the conversation is very much about this exact group?

I'm not going to call you shallow minded - because I know better than that. But maybe you just weren't thinking when you made your post.

I like this version of GWN.

Anyway, I never said exclude anyone.  I merrily stated a scientific fact in response to Ban's posts and comments he made trying to lecture people.  People that personally know me I am a very inclusive person and I'll call you whatever you want to be called and it is no skin off my back.  Do I agree someone is a cat if they believe they are a cat...no, but I'll call them a cat if they would like me to.  Same if a biological man wants to be called a woman, then I'll call him a woman.  Does that mean he can change in front of biological females or play sports against them, no I DO NOT agree with that.  Not because I don't want them to be included, but rather it is just wrong.  Unfortunately right now we don't have sports that are transgender only...does that suck, yes, but life isn't fair.  Does that make me un-inclusive, or transphobic, absolutely not.  And if someone claims I am, well that is on them, and they are closed minded idiots who think the rest of the world needs to think exactly like they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Playwire Ad Area



  • Playwire Ad Area
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Adam Mattin

    Delta, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Stanford
    Projected Weight: 125, 133

    Grant Stromberg

    Mukwonago, Wisconsin
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Northern Iowa
    Projected Weight: 285

    Hudson Ward

    Canton, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 165

    Alex Reed

    Shikellamy, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125

    Darren Florance

    Harpursville, New York
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125
  • Playwire Ad Area
×
×
  • Create New...