Seeding Criteria

[MizzouFan01]

Looking ahead to the B12 tournament coming up, I was wondering. Who holds seeding criteria between R Elam, Surber and Batistida? All three are 1-1 HT. Elam beat Batistida, loss to Surber. Surber beats Elam, loss to Batistida. Batistida beat Surber, loss to Elam. Anyone know where each would be seeded? I want to guess Rocky gets the 1, but wasn’t sure based off the Surber loss. Elam, Surber, Younger, Sloan was my guess as to the top 4 at 197 in the B12.

[11986]

25 minutes ago, MizzouFan01 said:

Looking ahead to the B12 tournament coming up, I was wondering. Who holds seeding criteria between R Elam, Surber and Batistida? All three are 1-1 HT. Elam beat Batistida, loss to Surber. Surber beats Elam, loss to Batistida. Batistida beat Surber, loss to Elam. Anyone know where each would be seeded? I want to guess Rocky gets the 1, but wasn’t sure based off the Surber loss. Elam, Surber, Younger, Sloan was my guess as to the top 4 at 197 in the B12.

Guessing - whoever has the most conference wins overall gets higher seed. So if any of them missed conference matches that could hurt. 

[Idaho]

 

Trackwrestling has seeding information from last years tournament.... if you can figure out what it means. It "seems" to indicate total winning percentage rather than conference wins as criteria. 

https://www.trackwrestling.com/predefinedtournaments/MainFrame.jsp?newSession=false&TIM=1676599321031&pageName=%2Fpredefinedtournaments%2FTournamentCriteria.jsp&twSessionId=qcrcsqdmvf

[nhs67]

1 - 2 - 3 seem clear cut to me.

4 - 5 - 6 can be in any order.

Surber has a shit tonne of losses on the year.  One good win won't earn him a Top 3 seed.

Eliminating Surber from the 'three' OP mentions due to multiple conference losses makes it easy.  Elam has win over the guy who beat Sloan and over Batista.  Sloan is 19-1 where Batista is 14-4.  4-5-6 could be any order.  If they put emphasis on winning percentage or even inner conference winning percentage then Surber could end up the 6.  I think they will weight the win over Elam (as they should) and give him the 4.

I know I put him at 5 and not 4 in the screenshot here, but I do think they give him the 4.

Edited February 17, 2023 by nhs67

[Gus]

Sloan also has a win over Surber so I think he would be the 1 seed. He is the only guy undefeated in conference.

[nhs67]

1 hour ago, Gus said:

Sloan also has a win over Surber so I think he would be the 1 seed. He is the only guy undefeated in conference.

I could see that as well.  I had said Elam 1 and Sloan 2 based on the Andy Smith result, however weighting conference results makes more sense.

[nhs67]

I also want to see Elam get a chance to avenge his result prior yo NCAAs.

[ionel]

2 hours ago, nhs67 said:

1 - 2 - 3 seem clear cut to me.

4 - 5 - 6 can be in any order.

Surber has a shit tonne of losses on the year.  One good win won't earn him a Top 3 seed.

Eliminating Surber from the 'three' OP mentions due to multiple conference losses makes it easy.  Elam has win over the guy who beat Sloan and over Batista.  Sloan is 19-1 where Batista is 14-4.  4-5-6 could be any order.  If they put emphasis on winning percentage or even inner conference winning percentage then Surber could end up the 6.  I think they will weight the win over Elam (as they should) and give him the 4.

I know I put him at 5 and not 4 in the screenshot here, but I do think they give him the 4.

Big 12 records?

[MizzouFan01]

4 hours ago, ionel said:

Big 12 records?

I thought the same at first, but the box shows affiliated conference and overall record, not record in the conference. At least I’m hoping so I don’t look crazy lol.