Jump to content
  • Playwire Ad Area

Montana is trying to outdo the rest of the red states


Mike Parrish

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Le duke said:


I’m not a journalist, and I don’t know that the blogger on SubStack claims to be one, either.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's just biased crap acting as if their bias is the superior way of thinking. When someone takes that much liberty It's usually BS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just biased crap acting as if their bias is the superior way of thinking. When someone takes that much liberty It's usually BS. 


So, is this a round about way of saying that you support such a bill?

Teaching religion as “facts” in every public school?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I see a trend with liberals assuming shit. So what you're saying is ______


It’s not an assumption that the author of the bill in MN wants to promote religion as fact. He says it in the bill, verbatim. It’s patently unconstitutional and also, if one has real faith, counter-intuitive to the actual practice of faith.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Le duke said:

 


It’s not an assumption that the author of the bill in MN wants to promote religion as fact. He says it in the bill, verbatim. It’s patently unconstitutional and also, if one has real faith, counter-intuitive to the actual practice of faith.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I disagree with your conclusions.  You are again projecting to make you bias work. You are taking more liberty with that than even the author is.  BTW intelligent design is not religious.  It is not Christian, it is not Muslim.  It is an actual scientific position.  But instead of learning about it you just approach it with your bias. You don't have a scientific mind. You're more interested in setting up a strawman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with your conclusions.  You are again projecting to make you bias work. You are taking more liberty with that than even the author is.  BTW intelligent design is not religious.  It is not Christian, it is not Muslim.  It is an actual scientific position.  But instead of learning about it you just approach it with your bias. You don't have a scientific mind. You're more interested in setting up a strawman. 


So, as opposed to learning about the motives of the bill’s author, based on his public profile, in your mind, the logical thing to do is to ignore everything he’s ever said in public, and go with an interpretation that is at odds with the bill’s author’s known beliefs?

Really?

PS, I have an MS in Remote Sensing. An R1 institution deemed me sufficiently science-minded to award it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Le duke said:

 


So, as opposed to learning about the motives of the bill’s author, based on his public profile, in your mind, the logical thing to do is to ignore everything he’s ever said in public, and go with an interpretation that is at odds with the bill’s author’s known beliefs?

Really?

PS, I have an MS in Remote Sensing. An R1 institution deemed me sufficiently science-minded to award it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Then you should know better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, El Luchador said:

So is the guy whose name is on the mrna patent and pioneered the research a real expert? 

I don't know. 

I haven't looked into that particular subject in that level of detail. I suspect one could find out in a relatively short time - but, then again, I'm not sure of that either.

In a conversation, sometimes admitting that we just don't know is a pretty good answer to a question. 

 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, mspart said:

Pretty bad when the bill you sponsored and wrote is so bad you have to vote against it.    That is quite the trick.

mspart

The trick will be to see them re-elected. 

Either the voters don't know, don't care, or there's some other carrot in their view.

Then again, could be a great person who made a bad mistake and is voting against it to make it right. That's not all bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Playwire Ad Area



  • Playwire Ad Area
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Adam Mattin

    Delta, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Stanford
    Projected Weight: 125, 133

    Grant Stromberg

    Mukwonago, Wisconsin
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Northern Iowa
    Projected Weight: 285

    Hudson Ward

    Canton, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 165

    Alex Reed

    Shikellamy, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125

    Darren Florance

    Harpursville, New York
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Lock Haven
    Projected Weight: 125
  • Playwire Ad Area
×
×
  • Create New...